Krashen: Foreign Language Learning--Christophe Clugston

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,744
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 7, 2011

Krashen and Terrel, ALG what the others lied to you about in Language Learning: Christophe Clugston. TO POST REPLY: Real Name, Real Photo, no torlling.

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (christopheclugston)

  • Remember if you want to post comments: REAL NAME, REAL PHOTO, if you assert something citations are necessary. This is not the amateurish, non academic YT place for your opinions with no credentials: you can go to all of the pundit YT language channels to do that. THE STANDARDS ARE HIGHER HERE.

  • Thanks for the intellectual direction... definitely will be doing lit. review tomorrow!

  • @changchangxuexi Review of what?

  • It's too bad more ACTUAL linguists like yourself are not talking about linguistics on youtube. Sine seeing your videos, which was a long time ago, I started to do some reading into what Krashen actually has said and the research behind TPR and the like. After reading what I could find I think Kaufmann really needs to sit down and reread and think about what he has been saying..but then I doubt that would happen. Good videos! Keep up the good work!

  • @epsilon910 I think the reason more real linguists aren't bothering with YT is that all of this stuff is self evident: people like Kaufman are sans credentials and aren't even worth considering. I just decided that as a Public Service some of the people (like you) with desires for the truth and real research would like the chance to hear it. Only the sycophants and self declared experts can't accept the World is not Flat!! (They are trying to sell their version of left brain methods.)

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @brandoscostumes Your view and your claims warrant no attention. You fail in proving anything you state.

  • @brandoscostumes If you were in my class you would have garnered a FAIL. You were told not once, not twice, but many times--PROVIDE RESEARCH to support your claims. You have not done that--you continue talk as if you are a self created expert and that we must meet your criteria (whatever that might be). Let's recap: 1) You stae only emotional pleas, 2) you have not defined terms 3) You refuse to research 4) You refuse to do a literature review 5) you fail to understand academic quality

  • @brandoscostumes YOu slept through it--so yuo have confirmed you have no basis to postulate your ideas from--just emotional pleas.

  • @christopheclugston no i slept through the SLA courses. but i did read the asher paper and i think appeals to common sense and good judgement is more helpful on youtube than obscure research

  • you are peddling to completely the wrong crowd, since TPR is an attempt to reform language teaching, not learning, and for stated purposes that dont apply to anyone on youtube. that is obtuse.

    as for the research the assessments are vague and since it admits later active instruction in L1 is inevitable i dont see how it can claim to be more efficient than a more student-friendly traditional approach of 'left brain' analysis that skips the physical stuff. or have u not seen the utter tpr fiascos

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more