Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Do you need a license to travel?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
21,765
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 25, 2008

This man came from Bakersfield, ca to visit his sick sister in the hospital. Unfortunately, he was stopped and the officers found out that the man driving had no valid drivers license. So, without due process, the officers towed the mans van who was not driving in commerce.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Tactikalguy1)

  • It's not just that the van's owner didn't have a license but that the corporate STATE Certificate of Title wasn't CANCELED. When this title is in place it gives the corporate STATE of _______ a security interest in the vehicle. CANCEL the corporate STATE OF ______ title and create your own with only your name and record it at the County Recorder, newspaper etc. and carry a certified copy.

  • @EZrhythm .. Do you have proof of you doing this in court?

  • @EZrhythm .. Do you have proof of you doing this in court?

see all

All Comments (263)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @justaman6972

    Your automobile by definition is a motor vehicle. As an example, in California:

    Section 415. (a) A "motor vehicle" is a vehicle that is self-propelled.

    AND

    Section 260. (b) Passenger vehicles and house cars that are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit are not commercial vehicles.

    You CAN travel in your automobile, as long as you are not the one behind the wheel. THAT is driving a car. :)

  • @RetSquid correct to drive a motor vehicle is a privilege. To travel in my automobile is a right! You failed to finalize the cite.

  • @justaman6972 No it isn't.

  • @justaman6972

    "The right to operate a motor vehicle is wholly a creation of state law; it certainly is not explicitly guaranteed by the Constitution, and nothing in that document or in our state constitution has even the slightest appearance or an implicit guarantee of that right. The plaintiff's argument that the right to operate a motor vehicle is fundamental because of its relation to the fundamental right of interstate travel ... is utterly frivolous."

    City of Salina v. Wisden

  • @justaman6972

    "Because drivers' personal, identifying information is, in this context, an article of commerce, its sale or release into the interstate stream of business is sufficient to support congressional regulation."

    The information, not the vehicle or the operator.

  • @justaman6972

    LOL!! That is a brief, not a court decision, you goofball. WOW!! What stupidity!

  • @RetSquid “The activity licensed by state DMVs and in connection with which individuals must submit personal information to the DMV - the operation of motor vehicles - is itself integrally related to interstate commerce”.

    Seth Waxman, Solicitor General

    U.S. Department of Justice

    BRIEF FOR THE PETITIONERS

    Reno v. Condon, No. 98-1464, decided January 12, 2000, United States Supreme Court

    thus endeth the lesson.you are an idiot ,never citing a single source,so fuck off...

  • @RetSquid DRIVER. One employed.Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed, 1951.

    "Motor vehicle" means every description or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, or passengers and property.Title 18 USC 31: Newbill vs. Union Indemnity Co., 60 SE.2d 658 in the actual prosecution of business, it was possible for the same person to be both 'operator' and 'driver.'" Where's your citations?

  • @justaman6972

    Sorry, an operator is the person behind the wheel of the vehicle controlling it's movements.

    Operator: One who operates a machine or device.

    Driver: One that drives, as the operator of a motor vehicle.

    Your dictionary from the 1800's is not the one used by SCOTUS today, they use many different ones. And they do not use 'driving' as a commercial only activity.

  • @RetSquid it does when it's the only book of words and phrases that the SCOTUS uses to determine constituional definintions. The Constitution being the supreme law of the land, nitwit. Operator and driver are the same. Words like motor vehicle and traffic, driver all are concerned with commerce period. Not real bright are ya?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more