With that I should note, that while conventional IQ tests are good indicators of “crystallized intelligence”, they are ,generally, poor indicators of fluid intelligence. The later, is widely thought to be expandable, and there is now a good deal experimental evidence, to support this. Maybe one day we can scan a person’s brain and infer individual limitations, from elements of structure and reflex. But that day, has not yet come.
@zadeh79 I was refering more to the way the tests are scored, not the testing questions themselves. But interestingly enough, since my post a year ago, I've begun developing my own online I.Q test to address the problems I'm found in other tests.
@seplrm It depends, online IQ tests probably hold more validity until late adolescents when fluid intelligence is most expandable. If you come across one that is age-normed correctly, than it may in fact, hold more validity than conventional tests. This is because online tests are saturated with fluid properties, that require high levels of abstraction, and administered tests emphasized crystallized intelligence.
I know this mofo and if he's winning IQ tests then i'm not long for this earth. Look at the celebration it's nothing but sheer arrogance. This guy's ignorance is only surpassed by his insignificance. But he won't accept that because he thinks he's the king of the Jews.
I teach English over seas, and I've met two children who I'd concider genius and that's it. I know a lot of wanna be genius' who've taken their bullshit internet tests, but these kids were brillant. The only two I've ever met. TickleIQ is crap, absolute crap. There is no way answering 25 similar weighted questions means my I.Q is a 150, the highest possible on that test. and Culture fair european is also crap. Highsociety is decent.
I.Q tests found on the internet are poorly scored. So many people I know inlcuding myself would be concidered genius with our 140, 150, 160+ I.Q's. But the truth is, most honest I.Q tests don't do well over 140. An I.Q of a 150 is suppose to be one in 5000. that means my friends and I met in a small school so the odds are about one and 20,000. Fat chance. Test the nation is probably more accurate than mr 152 would like to believe.
has anyone got the full episode of this test or any other test the nation uk tests?
chaingangsoldier3100 1 year ago
With that I should note, that while conventional IQ tests are good indicators of “crystallized intelligence”, they are ,generally, poor indicators of fluid intelligence. The later, is widely thought to be expandable, and there is now a good deal experimental evidence, to support this. Maybe one day we can scan a person’s brain and infer individual limitations, from elements of structure and reflex. But that day, has not yet come.
zadeh79 1 year ago
@zadeh79 I was refering more to the way the tests are scored, not the testing questions themselves. But interestingly enough, since my post a year ago, I've begun developing my own online I.Q test to address the problems I'm found in other tests.
seplrm 1 year ago
@seplrm It depends, online IQ tests probably hold more validity until late adolescents when fluid intelligence is most expandable. If you come across one that is age-normed correctly, than it may in fact, hold more validity than conventional tests. This is because online tests are saturated with fluid properties, that require high levels of abstraction, and administered tests emphasized crystallized intelligence.
zadeh79 1 year ago
I also note that Lusipher somehow manages to appear smaller when he's stood than when he's sat on his fat arse.
velvetstripper 2 years ago
I know this mofo and if he's winning IQ tests then i'm not long for this earth. Look at the celebration it's nothing but sheer arrogance. This guy's ignorance is only surpassed by his insignificance. But he won't accept that because he thinks he's the king of the Jews.
velvetstripper 2 years ago
128..... half the crowd must be disabled then
dodoboy1212 2 years ago
lusipher diablo??
haha
BowlPirate 3 years ago
I teach English over seas, and I've met two children who I'd concider genius and that's it. I know a lot of wanna be genius' who've taken their bullshit internet tests, but these kids were brillant. The only two I've ever met. TickleIQ is crap, absolute crap. There is no way answering 25 similar weighted questions means my I.Q is a 150, the highest possible on that test. and Culture fair european is also crap. Highsociety is decent.
seplrm 3 years ago
I.Q tests found on the internet are poorly scored. So many people I know inlcuding myself would be concidered genius with our 140, 150, 160+ I.Q's. But the truth is, most honest I.Q tests don't do well over 140. An I.Q of a 150 is suppose to be one in 5000. that means my friends and I met in a small school so the odds are about one and 20,000. Fat chance. Test the nation is probably more accurate than mr 152 would like to believe.
seplrm 3 years ago