Top Comments
All Comments (46)
-
@heavytom89 actually what promted me to write that comment i have no idea lol i must of been high on something at the time, casino was waaaaaay better, hopefully bond 23 next year will own both previous installments, they announced the actor thats playing the villain today, the guy that was in no country for old men
-
@ankerman92 yeah especially since it basically compromised on everything that made the Bond movies special and uniqe. I am what you can call a true Bond fan, I have read all the books and seen every movie but I will never call this a good bond movie. Its nothing more than an average action movie.
-
even if you hate this movie, you gotta admit the last 5 minutes between bond and M was a great scene.
-
@SuburbianKnights It reveals the point of the organization from the first craig film. They are elites working behind the scenes to control national interests. They influence global politics, national interests and who pursues them, and have a hold on both west/east powers. This organization doesnt really want money, it wants -power-. Water will be more valuable that oil one day. Plot indeed.
-
Wasn't keen on this one. Casino Royale was way better, it was a really emotional film that portrayed Bond as a vulnerable and rather troubled agent. It showed that Bond is not unstoppable. That he has flaws.
-
It's funny to watch old 007's and see all the things that Q thinks is Hi-tech and worth millions, then you realise you bought it for $10.
-
THIS FILM HAD NO FREAKIN' PLOT!
-
The film was very dissapointing it had little plot,no character development and all the action was terribly edited which made the action impossible to follow
-
I know obviously he wouldn't be able to play him be but I wish sean Connery was still bond
this movie was fuckin awsum, fuck the haters, any true bond fan would have loved the movie like i did, better than casino royale in my opinion
ankerman92 3 years ago 7
good film but a bit too short
capownz 3 years ago 6