Debunking 9/11: NIST Building 7
Uploader Comments (AlienScientist)
Top Comments
-
I wonder where the debunkers will go when the truth comes out. Will they look to their handlers for help. They will find none there. They will only find bullets aimed at their heads. The debunkers don't understand that they can never be allowed to tell anyone that the government hired them to do this. It would completely erode all confidence in the government.
Video Responses
All Comments (294)
-
there is no truth. accept the mystery.
-
@ AlienScientist - Great job doing this video. I have no idea why you would even bother to retort or debate someone like CrazyRay7979. It's now over ten years later and "the people" have still swallowed the whole myth. I'm amazed, startled, & dumbfounded at the reaction of the general public over the events that transpired throughout that awful day. People disappoint me on a daily basis for their lack of critical thinking skills. I'm glad I stumbled across you. I know now that I'm not alone.
-
@CrazyRay7979 "that" was retarded,lol.
-
Although probably correct, truthers will never come out on top unless they gain tons and tons of public support very quickly. As soon as you start becomming a threat to the government they'll use the CIA to assasinate you and make it look like an accident!!!
-
Take your Incredulity to someone who cares.
NYFD Fire Chiefs on the ground said that 7 was badly damaged, and was fully involved with fire.
Sorry Bub...I will believe them long before I believe a YT CT Nutter.
My advice: turn off the puter, wash your face and some clothes, toss the bag of pot, check the job listings, try to find a GF. Try to get out and function.
-
You actually read 10000 pages of government report? Kudos man, but your "facts" point to nothing more than bureaucratic sloppiness.
-
So instead of changing the subject...what does NORAD have to do with the WTC on 9/11?
LOL, you go from "explain NORAD" to "Cheney conspiracy"...
I just made you look like a fool; not knowing that NORAD wouldn't have shot down the hijacked planes, not knowing that NORAD wasn't even involved until after the 2nd Tower was hit...and you just reply with more conspiracy bullshit
Hell, why would the planes really even matter, you Truthers swear that 9/11 was a controlled demolition.
Securacom, why can't you say "Securacom"??? Probably because people will Google Marvin Bush and Securacom and see there's no connection as they didn't do any work at the WTC since 1998 and Marvin Bush left the company as a longtime board member in June 2000...so then you bring Wirt Walker III into the picture because he's a Bush cousin and was the CEO from '99-'02...but again, no work at the WTC after 1998...so there's nothing there...thanks for playing!
CrazyRay7979 1 year ago
@CrazyRay7979,
It astounds me that people with top CIA training and virtually unlimited funding and resources could have been so sloppy in the preparation and planning of the attacks. I guess this was a bit a of a sly move on their hand. Pretending to leave in 1998 while retaining contracts that would expire the morning of 9/11/2001, figuring all the records would be destroyed. Marvin even leaves the company in June (after the Ace Elevator renovation)
Who's Playing? Is this a GAME to you?
AlienScientist 1 year ago 6
Suspicious power-downs and evacuations, says two people...not suspicious at all, buildings like the WTC are constantly being reconstructed, renovated, etc. and any large building and skyscraper has regular fire and emergency drills just like we used to have in school...and note that the claimed "power-down" was only in WTC2...
CrazyRay7979 1 year ago
@CrazyRay7979, "Suspicious power-downs and evacuations, says two people...not suspicious at all" LOL! No, nothing suspicious there alright. Minimize the issue, lie about the numbers (more than two people reported the power-downs) and twist it around a fallacy which ignores the entire context of the situation.
We were talking about who could have planted nanothermite in the Twin Towers. You know, like the kind that scientists found in samples of WTC Dust, which is the same kind from LANL...
AlienScientist 1 year ago 3
No building fell at free-fall speed or at near free-fall speed on 9/11, it's been proven and Truthers ignore the proof and repeat the same old conspiracy theory rhetoric so that other Truthers do not find out the truth
The BBC and CNN knew because the NYFD who were there at WTC7 announced that it was going to fall...so the news jumped the gun, so what? It happens all the time. So, what, you think the BBC and CNN are also behind 9/11 or something?
CrazyRay7979 1 year ago
@CrazyRay7979 on Free Fall: "it's been proven and Truthers ignore the proof and repeat the same old conspiracy theory rhetoric so that other Truthers do not find out the truth"
WTC 7 endured 2.4 seconds of total free fall. No engineer can explain how a tall reinforced steel and concrete building could naturally collapse in this manner from briefly burning fires. NIST=FAIL.
The BBC and CNN's early intelligence report is more evidence of inside intelligence failures on 9/11. Yes.
AlienScientist 1 year ago 3