Another Proof Of God: Irreducible Complexity & The Bacterial Flagellum - The Atheist Experience #600
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (640)
-
I'm sure that this has come up before, but the argument of complexity=(intelligent)design
er...How does that even work? There are many things that are complex because they lacked a single unifying (or intelligent) designer or design. Take for example city sprawls or bureaucratic systems. These to me are examples of things that exist in a complex fashion because of a lack of a unifying design, but they still "work". -
@sims3loser That cracked me up too. :)
-
"help theres proof of god on my head" lol
-
This caller doesn't understand that websites can be out of date? He thinks that when website is out of date that its contents are necessarily still accurate? He doesn't understand that the website may be intentionally incorrect because it has an agenda?
And then he says that the only reason he doesn't do evil things is because his Christianity is holding him back.
He's clearly deranged. If he's allowed to walk among us, someone should ensure he stays in church to keep the rest of us safe.
-
Every turd seems to have a design, but that doesn't make it Holy shit. The problem with the idea that this universe is designed is that we don't have an undesigned universe to compare it with.
People call it designed because they can't imagine how this planet could have been suitable for us if it hadn't been designed, but that is flawed thinking. If Earth hadn't been inhabitable for us, we simply wouldn't have been here to be amazed about the fact that it is.
-
@TheAtheistExperience Atheism FTW? lmao.. when i said no evidence there is no God or there is one. i meant "A Creator". this thing is not a person but could be a force. The universe has a Design so some kind of intelligent being could have been behind it.
Now if this "Thing" has a relationship with it's creation is a different Topic.we are discussing the existence of creator (A GOD).. Not Religion.Take Religion out of it.
and my Dictionary doesn't say Atheist is a lack of belief on a deity
-
- "Atheist Claim to 'know' there's no God."
No, atheists don't know anything about any gods. That is why they don't believe in them. Even though some 'strong' atheists may put it like that, atheism is NOT the belief that there is no god, but a lack of belief in any god.
To put it simply: a-theist is just a label for everyone who is not a theist. That is not just "surely not," but that also includes "don't know (yet)" and "don't care".
-
@TheAtheistExperience There is no evidence against the existence of a God either. Atheist Claim to "know" there's no God. yet don't have the evidence to back it up. Religious people claim to "know" there is a God yet don't have the evidence to back it up.
-
@TheGiantSpaceHamster hey if you think the creator is a giant Spaghetti Monster Good for you!.. YOU must of had some fucked up childhood.
-
@TheAtheistExperience (continued)
The point is there are countless possible 'gods' against only 1 'none'.
If there is not even evidence for one god, there could be 1 God + 10 Norse gods + 100 Greek gods + 1000 Hindu gods = 1111 gods, but we only pick 1 personal god.
Chance to pick 1 god and be right: 1/1111 = ~0%
Chance to pick 1 god and be wrong: 1110/1111 = ~100%
Chance to pick no god and pick the wrong one: 0/1111 = ~0%
Chance to pick no god and be right: 100% - 0/1111 = ~100% (Atheism FTW!)
What a douche this caller was. This is what religion does, it rots the brains and ruins lives.
bary1234 10 months ago 21
The idea of irreducible complexity proves only the limitations in human thinking, but science has a way of helping us get around those limitations, because it is much larger than any individual's findings and opinions. It relies on evidence and continual efforts to disprove theories. If creationism were scientific, it would find evidence creation rather than pointing at a perceived fault in evolution and then crying "See? God did it!"
ehwood99 11 months ago 11