Ground Effect Flight Test On The 777
Uploader Comments (kurtsnyder)
Top Comments
-
looked like when he recovered he almost skinned his tail
All Comments (10)
-
Ground effect is really an issue when debating the facts concerning 9/11 and the Pentagon. watch "National Security Alert" from Citizen Investigation Team! and please watch all the vids from pilotsfor911truth. Do not believe the media, wikipedia, wikileaks ormost of the weblogs. Please investigate - this is important
-
@kurtsnyder so why is that funny?
-
I laughed at the going around bit at the end!Great video thanks.
-
you are 100% correct...either the plane was high enough to fly, in which case the hole would have been up in the air, OR it was lower, in which case the engines would have hit the grass. Can't have it both ways!..but .. interesting that some idiot give your comments thumbs down. Lukily for Bush and co. there are mostly just sheep out there.
what does he say about the pilots at 0:37?
nicenow25 1 year ago
@nicenow25 He says "somewhere in here the pilot has to think about going around."
kurtsnyder 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How is it possible that a plane doing 500mph could skim the lawn at the Pentagon and hit the wall only a few inches above the wall if ground effect is real?
In this video the planes cockpit is way up in the air, yet the Pentagon claim the nose of the plane when right into the wall?
You must be mistaken in this video?
ShadowWorks 4 years ago
I'm not sure what you're driving at. Ground effect is a scientific principal that has been around long before 9-11. Also, a plane going 500mph and one that is right above stall speeds have markedly different attitudes.
kurtsnyder 4 years ago 3
Very cool! I went to the 2006 conventon in D.C., I loved it! =D
ThreeCharlieKilo 4 years ago 3
Those conventions are a blast! Especially when I got to fly 2 hours in a 737-500 Level D sim at United Pilot Training Center. Wow!
kurtsnyder 4 years ago