@PatsRDaBest1283 There is no original QB rating. That's a Passer rating which is very flawed. This new system brings in so much more. The new Quarter Back Rating, which is the first official QB Rating. It judges both running and passing and how they affect a game. Not just their passing rating. Before if a Qb threw a pick and it wasn't his fault, but the WR's. He got hurt by it. Not he won't.
Why change something that isn't broken? The original QB rating was just fine. I am not completely against this new system but I feel like it just should not have been changed.
@bobbielmaster sucks
kansasXcityXstealth 6 months ago
You make a good point actually. But aren't they using both of them as stats? the original QB Rating and the new one?
PatsRDaBest1283 6 months ago
@PatsRDaBest1283 There is no original QB rating. That's a Passer rating which is very flawed. This new system brings in so much more. The new Quarter Back Rating, which is the first official QB Rating. It judges both running and passing and how they affect a game. Not just their passing rating. Before if a Qb threw a pick and it wasn't his fault, but the WR's. He got hurt by it. Not he won't.
kcomo93 6 months ago
tim tebow!!
bobbielmaster 6 months ago
Why change something that isn't broken? The original QB rating was just fine. I am not completely against this new system but I feel like it just should not have been changed.
PatsRDaBest1283 6 months ago
what next ESPN??? sexines factor??
Szekler11 6 months ago
goood
maxamed124 6 months ago
Great, because there weren't enough stats to keep track of before.
p.s. - Jon & Jaws are douches
Dahby243 6 months ago
ESPN SUCKS!
bambam0078 6 months ago
How about no QB ratings at all? Cant we just evaluate them using "Spectacular, Great, Good, Aite, Bad, Horrible, Failed, Whatdafukwereuthinking?"
oppa1987 6 months ago