http://noendinsightmovie.com/ The first film of its kind to chronicle the reasons behind Iraq's descent into guerilla war, warlord rule, criminality and anarchy, NO END IN SIGHT is a jaw-dropping, ...
http://noendinsightmovie.com/ The first film of its kind to chronicle the reasons behind Iraq's descent into guerilla war, warlord rule, criminality and anarchy, NO END IN SIGHT is a jaw-dropping, insider's tale of wholesale incompetence, recklessness and venality.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
perhaps the u.s just rat them out after selling them the nukes themselfs, after all we are the biggest providers for their training and arsenal, we are the largest dead machine in the history of the world, and we haven't even started.
Well, you could get into an argument as to whether some action or another is moral. I think for the purpose of practicality it's not so much that some historical nastiness occurred, rather that we do what we can - to prevent such a recurrence in the future. That to me, seems far, far more useful than reparations nonsense, which leads to worrying about whether 10 years at Dachau is worth 4$ on the hour or 5$ and implies that abject suffering and degeneracy is simply an "overhead" cost.
In the case of Viet Nam, simply put, Russam, McNamara and Bundy were working off of largely incorrect presumptions about the Vietnamese conflict itself, earnestly but incorrectly - as it turns out.
Iraq, it's different, in so far as it is entirely unclear considering the 2nd tier personalities involved. That those individuals informing Mr. Bush's views were working in the interests of the US & here we are today - contemplating similar action against Iran as they develop nuclear capability.
While conservative elements of the Israeli body politic are extraordinarily concerned about Iran.
Iran simply is defiant, 5 nations in Iran's region already have nuclear weapons, there is a second arms race, and that does suck, but if we wanted to be serious about counter-proliferation we needed to be doing so consistently 25 years ago. Today it is more than a little late, so US (not Israeli) economic interests, oil/gas price stability specifically, must take precedence over others concerns.
SCUD - Type 3 missiles (the most common type) can carry small payloads inaccurately up to 500-800 nautical miles. These missiles could easily include a small "gun-type" Hiroshima style weapon of modern design.
Largely the states in the "lower tier" were not acquiring nuclear weapons for reasons all that far removed from simple Bourgeois impulse ( simply to know they have one ), like a new Bentley or Porsche only with more gamma ray output & generally not from a warranted military viewpoint.
We don't as a general rule do very much about atrocities not historically, not today, generally not ever. We clean up, we tend to prevent those problems that are in our interests, but since WW2, in the Iraqi & Vietnamese case, there were no compelling national interests save those conjured by politicians & militarists through manipulation of intelligence in BOTH cases. In Vietnam the game was to inform McNamara's viewpoint , in Iraq the game was to encourage Mr. Bush's personal inclinations.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Iraq, it's different, in so far as it is entirely unclear considering the 2nd tier personalities involved. That those individuals informing Mr. Bush's views were working in the interests of the US & here we are today - contemplating similar action against Iran as they develop nuclear capability.
Iran simply is defiant, 5 nations in Iran's region already have nuclear weapons, there is a second arms race, and that does suck, but if we wanted to be serious about counter-proliferation we needed to be doing so consistently 25 years ago. Today it is more than a little late, so US (not Israeli) economic interests, oil/gas price stability specifically, must take precedence over others concerns.
Largely the states in the "lower tier" were not acquiring nuclear weapons for reasons all that far removed from simple Bourgeois impulse ( simply to know they have one ), like a new Bentley or Porsche only with more gamma ray output & generally not from a warranted military viewpoint.