Fine. My "capacity" at calling(sic) fallacies is a result of my internalizing logical principles. My spurring(sic) of my misunderstanding of argumentation. As i said, Please refrain from immortalizing your ignorance. Your fallacies are now here for eveyone to see. Enough said.
Your capacity at calling fallacies where there aren't any has reached an unprecedented limit for me and it is very tiring. I won't block you unecessarily, but stop spurring your misunderstanding of argumentation on my channel and we shall both live happilly ever after.
I shall keep this conversation in my documents for restricted academic fair use.
"Merely translations"? You remind me of an islamist who when confronted with the absurdity of his claims resorts to, "But you don't know Arabic". As if knowing arabic could justify the unjustifiable. Truly, you are an unhappy marriage of arrogance and Ignorance.
Recent work in the Objectivist tradition has proved that the term "Essence" is an epistemological and not a metaphysical category. When I criticised you I assumed that given your temerity to attack Objectivism You would have at least a passing familiarity with it. I was wrong. You don't know anything about it.
By lampooning Objectivism I thought you were well versed with the Objectivist Epistemology. But reading your posts have made me realize that you don't know anything about it. Before you attempt to answer me , please peruse Ayn Rand's Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology.
I didn't "find"my Masters degree. Perhaps, where you live, they are sold by street urchins. Aristotle and Plato didn't even have high school diplomas. A man like you would cast aspersions on them for being without degrees to back up their claims. This just underscores your total second-handedness(contd)
The öbscure"philosopher is Ayn Rand. Perhaps you live in a cave somewhere. A non-essentiaist theory of essentials? you are putting words into my mouth. Before going on a wild goose chase, make sure you understand what the other person is saying. I am counting the fallacies: Ad Hominem, non sequitur, straw man, red herrings and an unlimited capacity for dropping context. Your Ignorance is Logic proof. Congratulations!!!
If i believe that "gloot" doesn't exist, it doesn't make my position anti-gloot. And by the way you should get your eyes rechecked. Your video carries the caption, "The world doesn't exist". How in the world do you expect anyone to divine that it isn't serious and just a pretentious attempt at levity on your attempt.
Fine. My "capacity" at calling(sic) fallacies is a result of my internalizing logical principles. My spurring(sic) of my misunderstanding of argumentation. As i said, Please refrain from immortalizing your ignorance. Your fallacies are now here for eveyone to see. Enough said.
badar189 2 years ago
Your capacity at calling fallacies where there aren't any has reached an unprecedented limit for me and it is very tiring. I won't block you unecessarily, but stop spurring your misunderstanding of argumentation on my channel and we shall both live happilly ever after.
I shall keep this conversation in my documents for restricted academic fair use.
maksiiiskam2 2 years ago
Ignorance is not a sin; persevering in ignorance definitely is.
badar189 2 years ago
"Merely translations"? You remind me of an islamist who when confronted with the absurdity of his claims resorts to, "But you don't know Arabic". As if knowing arabic could justify the unjustifiable. Truly, you are an unhappy marriage of arrogance and Ignorance.
badar189 2 years ago
Recent work in the Objectivist tradition has proved that the term "Essence" is an epistemological and not a metaphysical category. When I criticised you I assumed that given your temerity to attack Objectivism You would have at least a passing familiarity with it. I was wrong. You don't know anything about it.
badar189 2 years ago
I meant to say, "on your Part".
badar189 2 years ago
By lampooning Objectivism I thought you were well versed with the Objectivist Epistemology. But reading your posts have made me realize that you don't know anything about it. Before you attempt to answer me , please peruse Ayn Rand's Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology.
badar189 2 years ago
I didn't "find"my Masters degree. Perhaps, where you live, they are sold by street urchins. Aristotle and Plato didn't even have high school diplomas. A man like you would cast aspersions on them for being without degrees to back up their claims. This just underscores your total second-handedness(contd)
badar189 2 years ago
The öbscure"philosopher is Ayn Rand. Perhaps you live in a cave somewhere. A non-essentiaist theory of essentials? you are putting words into my mouth. Before going on a wild goose chase, make sure you understand what the other person is saying. I am counting the fallacies: Ad Hominem, non sequitur, straw man, red herrings and an unlimited capacity for dropping context. Your Ignorance is Logic proof. Congratulations!!!
badar189 2 years ago
If i believe that "gloot" doesn't exist, it doesn't make my position anti-gloot. And by the way you should get your eyes rechecked. Your video carries the caption, "The world doesn't exist". How in the world do you expect anyone to divine that it isn't serious and just a pretentious attempt at levity on your attempt.
badar189 2 years ago