Heath Slocum drains this 21 ft putt on the 18th hole for par and the win at the 2009 Barclays. Vote for this shot as the best of the week on PGATOUR.COM's Road to the TOUR Championship: http://bit.ly/RTTC09.
There's no need to get angry. Saying Tiger brought a ton of clueless people into the sport doesn't really make much sense, because I wouldn't have said he was a "has-been" (although that was perhaps a harsh term) unless I've known how he's played up to this point.
Perhaps I shouldn't have used the term "has-been", but still, even though he's been playing pretty consistent lately, he doesn't dominate tournaments like he used to.
One thing is for certain, Tiger has brought a TON of clueless people into the sport! LOL!
A "hasbeen?" Clueless.
How about the MOST wins on the PGA Tour this year, alone. How about 14 Majors in a row with the 54 hole. How about the fastest man ALIVE to 70 PGA Tour wins - before the age of 34.
How about NOT playing your best and STILL the number one player in the world AND FedEx Cup points number one. How about the best player to ever hold a golf club in their hands.
What's with all these nobodies winning PGA tournaments these days? It would have been much more interesting to have a 5-way playoff. I was hoping for him to miss that putt.
Tiger had so many easy chances but he blew them all. He's a has-been. When Tiger was at the peak of his career, he would sometimes win tournaments by 10+ strokes over the other players. Other times he'd barely pull of a win by succeeding at the right time. What happened to these occurrences?
I used to be coached by Heath's swing coach Mark Blackburn. I don't know if you've watched this video yet, but well done Heath and Mark. -Hudson
avidgolfer08 2 years ago
It's always nice to see someone other than Tiger win a tournament. Congrats to Heath.
texasflood54 2 years ago
And by "dominate" I mean easily win.
Alozaps 2 years ago
There's no need to get angry. Saying Tiger brought a ton of clueless people into the sport doesn't really make much sense, because I wouldn't have said he was a "has-been" (although that was perhaps a harsh term) unless I've known how he's played up to this point.
Perhaps I shouldn't have used the term "has-been", but still, even though he's been playing pretty consistent lately, he doesn't dominate tournaments like he used to.
Alozaps 2 years ago
One thing is for certain, Tiger has brought a TON of clueless people into the sport! LOL!
A "hasbeen?" Clueless.
How about the MOST wins on the PGA Tour this year, alone. How about 14 Majors in a row with the 54 hole. How about the fastest man ALIVE to 70 PGA Tour wins - before the age of 34.
How about NOT playing your best and STILL the number one player in the world AND FedEx Cup points number one. How about the best player to ever hold a golf club in their hands.
Even Jack says it.
757LeftSeat 2 years ago
Well, he doesn't play like he used to. That's all I'm saying.
Alozaps 2 years ago
your calling somebody that has won 5 tournements this year a has been. and a few weeks ago he went 50/50 inside ten feet.
TheExperience69 2 years ago
What's with all these nobodies winning PGA tournaments these days? It would have been much more interesting to have a 5-way playoff. I was hoping for him to miss that putt.
Tiger had so many easy chances but he blew them all. He's a has-been. When Tiger was at the peak of his career, he would sometimes win tournaments by 10+ strokes over the other players. Other times he'd barely pull of a win by succeeding at the right time. What happened to these occurrences?
Alozaps 2 years ago