Victoria Jackson Goes to "Occupy Wall Street" - Part 1

I spent two days with the "Occupiers." Most were college students and uninformed but passionate. Many were "high." The improv comedienne/radical environmentalist had never heard of Ian Plimer. The M.D. likes Obamacare but has just changed professions. An angry black woman shouted about "Troy." Union people marched by with identical T shirts and signs. Free food and medics were provided. (By whom? Soros?)

Although the "Occupiers" and "Tea Party" have one thing in common - we don't want the government to "bail out" corporations - the two movements are completely opposite. The "Occupiers" are being controlled by Saul Alinsky radicals who are 'transforming' America from a free country to a communist one, and the "Tea Party" is controlled by 'grassroots' folks who uphold the Constitution, worship the Creator and are fighting to keep America a free country.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• victoria
• jackson
• censored
• protest
• wallstreet
• conservative
• liberal
• new
• york
• city
• Wall Street
• New York City
• nyc
• manhattan
• crazy
• Manhattan
• communism
• marxism
• hippies
• today
• huffington
• post
• entertainment
• weekly

[halloranedward]

@madaboutpolitics Free education, you get what you pay for.

[madaboutpolitics]

@madaboutpolitics You graduated from a government education camp didn't you? You know...they're called public schools.

[madaboutpolitics]

@madaboutpolitics ...that is if they are not out trying their hardest. Plenty of folks just sit around and wait on the government to take care of them. There is no guarantee that one will attain great wealth in this country...just a guarantee that one has the right to TRY if one chooses. What gives you or anyone else the right to ask the government to steal from those who have earned it and redistribute the wealth?

[madaboutpolitics]

@richiefranklin76 Yes. That would be me, since I gave up my job to be a stay-at-home Dad and since I devoted 5 years to a non-profit that I started from scratch to try and help people. However, if a person works hard and smart and earns a lot of money, what right do you have to demand the government take it from them and hand it to you or anyone else for that matter? If a person does not provide the basics for their children then YES!!! they are lazy and irresponsible....

[SFitzgeraldVA]

@SouthernFriedGood I think I was quite clear that I am a Decmocratic Socialist which is not Marxism. (Google is your friend.) Who is the stupid one?

[gsprpltv]

How odd. You have 190K+ hits but twice as many dislikes as likes.

[SouthernFriedGood]

this marxist from Maryland gives stupid a new meaning.  Sick people indead. and hound doggy 7, your momma must have raised you to be a goat.

[richiefranklin76]

"They would much rather bitch and whine than actually accomplish something of value."

Value is subjective fella

Maybe some people place more value in raising families or having their own simple hobbies instead of being sociopathic businessmen swimming in cash.also if you ever remove your head from your ass I think you'll see that plenty of people work their butts off for years and never become rich.Does that mean they are lazy or irresponsible.Only brain dead morons like you believe that BS