Yaron Brook's Keynote Address at July 4 Boston Tea Party Protest (Part 1 of 2) (HD)

http://www.aynrandcenter.org/
http://www.arc-tv.com/

Yaron Brook delivers the keynote address at the July 4th Boston Tea Party Protest.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Yaron
• Brook
• Ayn
• Rand
• Institute
• Center
• for
• Individual
• Rights
• Objectivist
• Objectivism
• Free
• Market
• Economic
• Financial
• Crisis
• Independence
• Day
• Tea
• Party
• Boston
• Chicago
• Rick
• Santelli
• Obama
• Bush
• Socialism

[rskaimal]

I simply loved Dr. Brook's statement:

We need to dump that (the idea that you're your neighbor's keeper) in the river with the tea! Bravo!

[8888sam]

this man sould be president!!!

[Wejer3]

@aquatiq Obviously, you are in denial that Iran and Saudi Arabia are the two biggest terrorist sponsors in the world, and are actively seeking destruction of western values. But then again, in your "bubble" they are not a threat - what a suicide bomber or a nuclear weapon is for you I cannot say.

Of course I know that Ron Paul is against "foreign entanglements", and yes I would say that is consistent. However, it is consistent with a policy of appeasement, and not of self-defence.

[Wejer3]

@aquatiq I am not familiar with Ron Paul's personal life and will not comment on that. However, advising people to not have an abortion without having actual power to force one's will is exactly what the pope is doing. No one today is forced to be a catholic, obviously, but to turn an otherwise happy person into a sad and nervous wreck (which is the sad fate of most un-planned parenthoods) is exactly what one should be actively opposed to, and not silently accepting in the dark.

[aquatiq]

@Wejer3

You have given no such "evidence," unless you now say that you are god, and YOUR WORD is sufficient as "evidence."

Paul has railed against "foreign entanglements" since he took office, and CONSISTENTLY voted against them. Whether you agree or not that he has chosen to consistently limit our support of Israel to lip service, and "moral support," is irrelevant. The point is, that he has NOT been "hypocritical," he has been the opposite: principled.

[aquatiq]

@Wejer3

This is silliness. There is no "military threat," since even this lying and corrupt government blames 911 and it's magical building 7 on "terrorists," which are not military. I am fully aware that many sheeple in the US can redefine at will to suit their need for blood, but the truth is the truth: a is a.

[aquatiq]

@Wejer3

Hardly. I foresaw this sort of comment, and already handled this objection. Ron Paul choosing not to have his own children aborted, is NOT the same thing, as having an uncontrollable need to force other people out of abortion clinics.

As long as Paul continues to recognize individual rights--and their corollary: choice--then there is no issue worth mentioning. Paul DOES recognize a woman's right to her body; he just doesn't like the choice some make.

[Wejer3]

@aquatiq Hypocrite means preaching something but doing the opposite, such as preaching safety while undermining the very same. I have given ample examples in the case of Ron Paul, but if you want to be evasive about the evidence there is nothing I can do about it.

[Wejer3]

@aquatiq You didn't read my message properly. Notice that I said "military threat" - obviously american soldiers aren't going to come bombing your buildings, which would be something jihadists would happily do to you. And no, I don't like TSA or traffic cops either, but that is another chapter entirely, and cannot be measured in scale with a jihadist nation bent on world domination acquiring nuclear wepaons.

[Wejer3]

@aquatiq Ron Paul hating abortion is just as harmful as when the Pope is hating abortion, because it leads to unnecessary suffering and death that can be avoided.

[aquatiq]

@Wejer3

//all this would require "foreign entanglements" that Ron Paul cannot accept, thus making him a misfit hypocrite that should be ignored.//

I don't see how "hypocrite" fits. "Hypocrisy" would be, renouncing Hitler's genocide, while ignoring Columbus'.

Paul is no hypocrite, and should not be ignored. He is the ONLY truthful person with a national voice, and is a ray of hope, in a tunnel of REAL hypocrites.

[aquatiq]

@Wejer3

//Further, the #1 military threat today is from terrorist sponsoring states, and wiping them out (Iran first, Saudi Arabia second) is what would promote genuine self-defence, instead of living under constant fear (as it is today)//

Hardly. The #1 threat today, is from the federal government. Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc., are phantoms; the TSA, and local police who rob citizens on the highway--assuming they don't kill them--are a reality.