ShockofGod Radio Show FAIL

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,519
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 19, 2009

Shock is at it again with his famous loaded question "What proof or evidence do you have that atheism is correct?"
I hope my response settles this once and for all.
Links to articles of interest:
Shocks video:
http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod#p/a/u/0/5Jl3XfPkhzI

DarkTheAtheist video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTA5p0_pYwY

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hittites
http://heritage-key.com/blogs/bija-knowles/3700-year-old-wall-discovered-jeru...

  • likes, 13 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (flammamancer)

  • @dboydustin I am unaware of any atheist that says that every single last thing in the bible is false just that the historically accurate parts do not make the mythical parts accurate.

    For example Homers Illiad has allot of places, names and perhaps battles that are historically accurate but this does not mean that the Olympian gods that make regular appearances are actually real.

    My point was that apparently Nephie did not know that the Hittites are well established in the historical record.

Top Comments

  • @juplai if you are convinced that being an atheist is someone that "believes" there is no god then what would you call someone who simply lacks faith that there is a god?

    I really do not understand how you are suppose to start believing something just because you do not believe something else, for example just because I do not believe in the teapot orbiting the sun does not necessarily mean that I believe there is nothing orbiting the sun.

see all

All Comments (93)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Shock of god screens his replies.... How many different ways can you display lack of confidence in your "beliefs"?

  • @atheistram Wikipedia is a good source. Do you know that regular encyclopedia books are made just the same way and you don't have any information if the said thing is right or wrong. What's worse these books are made by less people who can't possibly know everything or if everything they know is correct to that matter. Wikipedia is actually a very good source to get correct information.

  • @atheistram, Actually Wikipedia is a very unbiased and neutral source. It's not as accurate as other encyclopedias, but it's fairly accurate.

  • @Nashhinton Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a good source.

  • @flammamancer, Archaeologists living before the 18th century had doubts concerning the existence of the hittites. I think Nephilimfree was saying that archaeologists and biblical critics living before the 18th century didn't believe in the biblical record's account of the existence of the hittites, because there was insufficient archaeological evidence to affirm their existence. If you would have read the entire Wikipedia article, you would agree.

  • Saying anything about shock of god is just feeding the troll. The guys obviously suffering from narcissistic personality disorder and doesn't even care if people can demolish his logic, what other people say just doesn't matter to him

  • ShockOfGod is a selective pressure on YouTube, I think he is immensely valuable.

    He is like the cheetah of youtube, the faster the cheetah becomes, the faster the gazelle becomes. The more shockofgod does, the more atheists there are.

  • How does Neph know that any Hittite ruins wereof the same date as when the Bible mentioned them? After all Creationists don't have any scientific dating methods.

  • shock is a pwned poser afraid of truth.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more