The Problem With International Law
Uploader Comments (mbrown0315)
Video Responses
All Comments (13)
-
Obviously it's not legal to use military force against a state due to the behavour of a private group or individuals; you can't hold an entire nation responsible for acts by priv. groups or people. Only the culprits themselves. An 'armed attack' in Article 51 of the UN Charter is the conventional armed forces of state attacking another state. Nothing more. Otherwise, RG: the UK should invade the US for hosting IRA collaborators & financiers. Doesn't happen because it holds ALL of the US resp.
-
@ballsauce666 "and Israel would have to behave like a good neighbor for once"
Written by moron.
Are Arabs such a great neighbors?
Obviously not and that's the root of problem.
-
@ParadiseZion Ik heb geen idee waar je het over hebt.
Maar laat maar, je bent een mafkeeeeez.
-
THE PROBLEM WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW
.
Written by a Zionist.
.
The problem with international law is that if Israel obeys it then they wont be able to steal Palestinian land and water, build illegal settlements for Jews from Russia and New York, kill Palestinians freely like the Israeli terrorist military likes to do, and Israel would have to behave like a good neighbor for once.
.
Israel will never allow such rubbish!
.
-
163 views for this video.......you guys should see a trend that the rest of the world sides on applying the same standards of the law to every country.
The Holocaust doesn't give Israel moral and ethnic immunity when clear war crimes are committed...
Read the Goldstone Report....at this moment you can evern see theUS possibly considering to distance itself from Israel because it's becoming harder to defend the illegal actions of a terror state.
-
The second reason is the "peace process," which has shown Israel as yearning for peace, which is internationally equated with being weak and without a backbone. Whether it is or not. When it is not, there is a myth of "just a little more pressure, and it will fall."
As Israelis say, "It's murderous peace."
-
Sorry, this time I disagree.
The reason for difference between the recent UN condemnations of Israel and the far more balanced UN document you site is not that Israel fought armies then and non-state groups now.
I think there are two main reasons. The first is the change of the world and the UN itself over all those years. Compare composition of UN in 1953 and now, and the growth of Arab power within the UN.
(cont.)
-
your videos are interesting
This is one of the smartest guys on YouTube with respect to the Israel/Arab conflict. To bad he seems to be MIA for about a year
gkraychik 9 months ago
@gkraychik I'm here. Just busy.
mbrown0315 9 months ago