New 9 11 Video Analysis by Richard D Hall (Part 1)

New 9/11 computer analysis provided by Richard D. Hall sheds light on what most likely caused the damage to the World Trade Centre towers. This 22 minute film provides answers to many questions.

Thanks so much to Richard for this excellent analysis - which raises more interesting and challenging questions, from the evidence analysed.

CheckTheEvidence.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• WTC attacks
• September the 11th

[TheJagger93]

So 9/11 is a conspiracy?

[mujaku]

@vengencefrom1979 A Boeing 767 could not even get past the palisades. Take the palisades and accelerate them to 400 mph ramming them into a standing 767. The 767 will turn into aluminium confetti.

[vengencefrom1979]

this is either an attempt to discredit the 9/11 truth movement or was done by an idiot. better footage reveals that the imaginary nose coming out of the south tower was not the nose but was debris.

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

Anybody with normal intelligence ain't congenitally appalled as Ms F Kang pretends to be. We "normals" are extremely interested in the fascinating Inside-Job results of googling Direct Energy Weapons 9/11 (Hint: go direct to drjudywood com) ... check out the most-extraordinary scientific experiments of one John Hutchison (no "n"), experiments that had the military steal his entire laboratory.

HINT 2: Compare desktop Hutchison with real-time WTC demolition disasters

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

Glad you enjoy the bellyache, dude ;-)

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard MrAutobuildit,

The only failures here are you moronic Twooftards. Your stupidity is appalling. I obviously meant that I can't explain anything to you because your too freaking stupid. And you didn't even understand that. OMFG, you prove my point without even realizing it. That is GD freaking hilarious.

[MrAutobuildit]

@wordgeezer

Every Crim leaves fingerprints, WG...she simply CANNOT just shove her grubby hands up her always-empty pockets.

e.g., the 9/11 PerpeTraitors left HUGE fingerprints all over the crime of the century, as we've known over a decade now

Wen won gets banned, she simply prints her phony finger into another FB account.... then that one gets banned

In your algorithmic formula above, just substitute kangtimeford for ronaldwieck

and see what sticks out like thin-dogz proverbials

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

You'll need to get a SOH if you want to join the Real World out here beyond your kiddie komics, sonny

[MrAutobuildit]

@kangtimelord

ref your seriously-flagged comment "No, I can't explain it" is your admission of failure.

We understand, friend

Google micro-nuke, suitcase nuke, mini-nuke and you will discover that (y)our government's non-fictional military arsenal (the WMDs they pretend to control that friendly Iran ain't aloud to own) just might appall even the likes of you....not that we expect a second admission of failure so soon after yr first

But don't be so shy. Why not surprise US?

[wordgeezer]

@MrAutobuildit Aw, that's a shame, and just as he was beginning to sound so authoritive.

Stopped by to visit won on his faux pootube channel and there are zero comments on anything...G%

youtubedotcom/comment_search?u­sername=ronaldwieck

No recent comments from ronaldwieck