Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

International War Criminal

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,021
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 2, 2008

If you like this subscribe

Si el video fue de su agrado por favor suscríbase

Con música de The Slackers

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (RedRude69)

  • what album is this faster version from?

  • @darraghmcb There 3 versios of this song

    1) Ep International War Criminal

    2) Peculiar

    3) Alive At The Ladybug House (Vic Ruggiero)

  • @darraghmcb There 3 versions of this song

    1) Ep International War Criminal

    2) Peculiar

    3) Alive At The Ladybug House (Vic Ruggiero)

  • I'm going to dumb down this comment section to ask, anyone know where to get the slower version of this song?

  • you are asking about the peculiar album version?

Top Comments

  • This is YouTube. The more hateful and uninformed your comments the higher their ratings. It's like a blood sport.

    You, sir, are the winning gladiator in a pit of hate and stupidity. And, like all good gladiators, you enjoy when the crowd gives you their thumbs up sign.

    I'm not saying you're wrong. A lot of what you said is right, you were just being a douche. However, Nazism is short for national socialism. That doesn't make them socialist, it just means they said they were socialist.

  • Bush=Bushit, Only good Fascist is a dead fascist

see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @RedRude69 There are 2 version of this comment ^^

  • @10ccalanarkush Also krugman's vast economic expertise led him to believe the recent run on gold was due to glenn beck's impeccable salesmanship. You really want to keep backing that horse? Also your entire response is an appeal to authority which is a logical fallacy.

  • @10ccalanarkush Actually yes, krugman doesnt know shit, he's just a party shill and a weak one at that. The fact he called it that only means he's as ignorant as you. I also give the nobel prize no credit considering they handed one to obama for peace while he was escalating a war. On top of all that, the austrians have been warning of the dangers of central and fractional reserve banking for over a century. You might have known that had you, i dont know, read any of them.

  • @ekeyra hmm, wow. stiglitz and krugman both wrote books on it - amazon . com/ Roaring-Nineties-History-World­s-Prosperous/ dp/0393058522

    both were nobel prize winners, maybe their grasp on econ is pretty tenuous, because you, ekeyra nameless youtube bot happen to be unaware of it? hmmm..makes you think.

  • @10ccalanarkush "Super Bowl XXXIV in January 2000 featured 17 dot-com companies that each paid over $2 million for a 30-second spot. By contrast, in January 2001, just three dot-coms bought advertising spots during Super Bowl XXXV."

  • @10ccalanarkush The point of my reply is that the "roaring" 90s werent roaring at all. The same way the "roaring" 20's werent roaring economically speaking of course. They were artificially inflated speculative bubbles fueled by cheap credit expansion (also fraud and counterfieting if anyone engages in those actions) made possible via the federal reserve. Thats why i "harp" on it. How is the liquidation of almost the entire industry NOT a market correction? Do you even know what one is?

  • @10ccalanarkush Besides the fact that ive never heard anyone, anywhere, at any time ever refer to the 90s as "roaring", your grasp of economics is as tenuous as your grasp of history.

  • @ekeyra that is such a classic misleading response - when did i ever say that the roaring 90s were solely characterized by the dot coms? of course the dotcom bubble and its aftermath was murky, and a handful certainly are still with us and flourishing - but damn, what a way to digress and waylay the real discussion! the majority of dotcoms were not 'correcting' themselves, that is blatantly untrue. furthermore, only nutty conspiratorial libertarians harp on the federal reserve act of 1913..

  • @10ccalanarkush The reality is that the 90s dot com bubble was just an inflationary boom period that collapsed and tried to correct itself at the turn of the millenium. Instead of letting that happen the feds, through regulation and cheap credit expansion inflated the housing bubble which collapsed in 08. Also, what laissez faire economic policies are possible with the fed creating credit and manipulating interest rates since 1913? Your grasp of economic history is flimsy at best.

  • @ekeyra oh sure. because history will paint laissez faire economics in very favorable light indeed, i only wish i could be alive in the 2100s to see what a beating austrian economics takes in the aftermath of 2008. you do realize that western economies will literally never recover to roaring nineties levels of dominance, right?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more