Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) have cited Shinki and Ed Paiks witness accounts to support their claims that the plane said to have hit the Pentagon on 9/11 (American Airlines Flight 77), actually flew on a different flight path (north of Citgo) and flew over the Pentagon. Ed Paiks account appears in their films The Pentacon, and most recently National Security Alert (NSA). In addition, Eds account has been cited repeatedly in their articles and online discussions. However, my January 2010 interviews of Ed and Shinki, as well as a 2006 interview of Ed recorded by Dylan Avery, Ed Paiks drawings and gestures for CIT, and other related material, show that certain facts have been omitted or distorted by CIT in their attempt to make their case for the north of Citgo path.
Related article:
Shinki and Ed Paik Accounts vs. CIT Methods
http://911reports.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/shinki-and-ed-paik-accounts-vs-cit...
Why didn't you interview the ANC guys?
I know why :)
Why didn't you get the POV from his window from where he crouched down?
I know why :)
Whynot point out that if the plane had travelled SOC that he would have seen the whole plane? That he wouldn't even have to crouch? That a plane travelling on THE SOC path 450ft away and at 233ft agl would NOT have had the effect on him he described?
Why not tell us that P4T has proven that the shadow could not reach his shop SOC?
I know why ;)
onesliceshort 2 years ago
Thank you Larson for confirming NOC.
You be coming over from the Dark side now?
onesliceshort 2 years ago
Great work hfartz444, it's nice to know that Ed Paiks account of where the plane was hasn't changed since CIT first interviewed him. Keep up the good work of confirming CIT's excellent reporting.
telday 2 years ago
Larson, the guy even says the plane flew over his shop. This is consistent with the north of citgo approach. Stop wasting so many man hours trying to muddy the waters re CIT's findings.
I rated your video 5 stars because he confirms the north path despite what your long-winded, verbose, wordy, verbose, long-winded "essay" tries to have everyone believe.
Kameelyun 2 years ago 2