Are You Gay Enough?

In a world where gays have control, discrimination reigns supreme. When gays are in charge, people are issued a 'GAY TEST' to determine if they are acceptable to gay people or not.

Three bisexual men filed a lawsuit in Seattle, Washington against the North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance (NAGAAA) claiming they were discriminated against for not being gay enough to participate in the organization's Gay Softball World Series, The Seattle Times reported Tuesday evening. The three men who filed the suit, Steven Apilado, LaRon Charles and Jon Russ, claim their softball team, D2, was disqualified from participating in the softball championship because the alliance ruled they were "nongay."

After D2 qualified for the 2008 championship series, the NAGAAA held a hearing to determine the sexual orientation of D2 players. The plaintiffs allege they were asked "personal and intrusive questions" about their sexual attractions and desires.
At one point during the questioning, D2 players were allegedly told, "This is the Gay World Series, not the Bisexual World Series."

The men are asking for $75,000 each for emotional distress, are seeking to invalidate the alliance's findings on the men's sexual orientations and to reinstate D2's second-place World Series finish.

The NAGAAA was formed in 1977 and now includes more than 680 teams in 37 leagues across the U.S.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Gay
• Homosexual
• Discrimination
• Test
• Softball
• Bisexual
• Yes
• Proposition
• Prop
• Prop8

[omiolo]

I think this goes to show that the radical homosexual agenda is NOT about equality but about SPECIAL rights and putting others in what they consider their place.

Yes on Prop 8 and then we will end their HATE!

[omiolo]

Edward Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, asserts in a column for National Review Online that Walker is making unlawful maneuvers to televise the Perry proceedings that violate long-standing federal judicial rules designed to guarantee a fair trial.

[omiolo]

Washington, DC—The National Organization for Marriage (NOM), the nation's largest and most influential group working to support traditional marriage, today announced it is joining with allies in Washington state to qualify a referendum blocking legislation that attempts to redefine marriage in the state.

[omiolo]

@pipper1232002 "these 3 men did was wrong"

filing a LAW suit AGAINST discrimination is wrong?

[omiolo]

National Organization for Marriage Joins Washington Referendum Fight

"We're committed to giving Washington voters the right to decide the definition of marriage in their state, just as 31 other states have been able to do."—Brian Brown, NOM President

[pipper1232002]

@omiolo I am gay myself and I think what these 3 men did was wrong but do know, not all gay men and woman are like them. They are just 3 people out of the whole gay community. I stand on my position NO on Prop 8

[adam120890]

OMG "gays" have this same problem with "straights" O.O. I have a sensible solution how about if people stop being so biased that would eliminate all forms of discrimination (For both gays and straights).... Moron

[omiolo]

“Is polygamy next?” Jonathan Yarbrough, part of the first couple to get a same-sex marriage in

Provincetown, Mass, said, “I think it’s possible to love more than one person and have more than one

partner. . . . In our case, it is. We have an open marriage.” Once you rip a ship off its mooring who knows

where it will drift next?

[omiolo]

Along the way he reconnected with family and made new friends, some who had also gone through recovery. He got on antiretroviral drugs, and within weeks his viral load was undetectable. He now works for Gay City Health Project, a community-based HIV-prevention program.

Duran has been sober for 2 ½ years

"Being gay and growing up feeling different, drugs were a good fit for me," Duran said. "But I believe in people's ability to change."

[omiolo]

As Judge Walker properly stated the standard: The court defers to legislative (or in this case, popular) judgment if there is at least a debatable question whether the underlying basis for the classification is rational…Most laws subject to rational basis easily survive equal protection review, because a legitimate reason can nearly always be found for treating different groups in an unequal manner.

[MacTipsHD]

Isn't the 'gayometer' which uses 'cocks/h' vulgarity, and therefor, antifamily?

grrr hypocrites

[soccermomd00d]

@omiolo Besides the fact that that didn't make any sense, why should I answer questions like that? Because I'm not a fundamentalist sheep, you've insisted on questioning me- how "unhappy" I am, rather then sticking to the subject. You're not a shrink, and your mind games don't work. I regard them as personal attacks.

Now, if you have a question pertinent to the subject at hand (ie: relating to the nasty 'homosex-ul' agenda' that you've been flapping your gums about), I'd be happy to humour you