Expelled - Teaching creationism in schools
Uploader Comments (djarm67)
Top Comments
-
You're wrong about that. Scientists don't actively disbelieve in a God. It's just that there is no reason to presume that a God has done anything because of a total lack of evidence. We know what creation would look like, animals would show up suddenly, without any ancestors. But we can show that all animals have ancestors. Creationism fails.
All Comments (6)
-
The truth is that only our Maker, Himself, in person is able to remake us again, if He wants to because there is no one else who can.
There is no other truth than that. The function of hydrogen inside of us proves that both we and the entire universe have a Maker.
watch?v=HoKVVYJ8KJM
-
I quite like the votebotting. You know, Creationists, this says more about you then it does about this video.
-
If you hold the presupposition and assumption that God can have absolutely no part in the origin of the earth, then you will find lots of evidences that supports your assumption, making it an absolute concrete reality to you. But if you start from the presupposition that God created, then you also can find tons of evidence that will solidify this belief. Evolutions can 'disprove' all creationist evidence, but creationist can 'disprove' all of theirs. facts don't cut it, both require faith
-
Yay science! XD
Time to test your assertion. Let's compare the fact that humans and chimps share thousands of endogenous retroviral fragments at identical insertion points. Explain this via evolution and creationism.
Even if God exists, science cannot comment. Science is bound by the process of methodological naturalism.
Creationism or any pseudo-science should never be taught in a science class. Even if true, it is simply not science.
djarm67 3 years ago