Animal Rights?
Loading...
Loading...
9:52
Atheism, Animal Rights & Ethical Veganism (1/2)by FFreeThinker14,769 views- 7:03
Mises Explodes Marxismby Austrolibertarian34,451 views
- 4:47
Broad Freedom of Associationby Austrolibertarian1,885 views
- 8:18
14 Ethics Animal Rightsby PhilosopherDena240 views
- 3:00
Eagle Flying / Eagle's Flightby backstagepiano414 views
- 10:00
Grand Jury Abuse Against Animal Rights Activistby xMFALx1,019 views
- 4:42
Rothbard on Animal Rightsby bitbutter1,478 views
- 6:42
Part 1 - Capitalist Myths - A Responseby Austrolibertarian1,437 views
- 1:06
klempererby chukchatundra22,547 views
- 9:50
Tom Regan: Animal Rights - An Introduction 2/5by rainerebert3,608 views
- 5:03
A Bad Anti-Global Warming Argumentby Austrolibertarian1,057 views
- 3:36
Animal right's harassing families on horse & carriage rides @ Christmas Central Park Ban blindersby StopLiesSeeTruth6,440 views
- 0:40
massive animal rights demonstration against gassing of geese in NJ parks (2 of 2).MP4by viking313251 views
- 7:59
Tom Selleck on the Rosie O'Donnell Showby dcalderisi450,116 views
- 3:58
Ali G - Animal Rightsby Boksis2,045,082 views
- 3:30
PETA NEEDS TO DIEby spartanquail57102,022 views
- 4:13
A debate on Vivisection between Michelle Thew and Professor Tipu Aziz moderated by Jeremy Paxmanby media15122,127 views
- 3:47
Andrew Copson interviews Prof. Sir David King.by TheSkepticMag310 views
- 9:39
Why animal rightsby drdanlyons1,925 views
- 2:16
Anarchists On Animal Rightsby VeganTruthist12,808 views
ok, first of all Richard Dawkins is a moron statheist.
Second of all, I'm a vegetarian, almost vegan and dont eat any animals or seafood.
Your arugment I find illogical, you say babies aren't an arguments because they are potential adults. Well what else could they become? Yet you weave a tangled web with Richard Dawkins crappy metaphor, and talk about rothbards argument being flawed on potentiality? Rediculous lol!
Anyways, love your channel and am subbing, mises ftw!
fleursdumal11 3 months ago
@Mastikator
I should've clarified "mental construct"
lol, i'm pretty sure you know what I meant since most people use it this way
stealthswimmer 1 year ago
@stealthswimmer What do you mean not objective just because it's a human construct? Cars are human constructs and they're pretty objective, right?
Mastikator 1 year ago
@Mastikator
Not necessarily. You could simply just explicitly acknowledge that rights are human constructs. Thus they are not objective.
stealthswimmer 1 year ago
great vid. agreed that it wasn't Rothbard's strongest point and that his reasoning was uncharacteristically weak on animal rights.
stealthswimmer 1 year ago
have you read A Libertarian Replies to Tibor Machan's 'Why Animal Rights Don't Exist' by David Graham?
praxe0l0gist 1 year ago
Exposing an argument as poor and disagreeing with it are two different things, it's our intellectual responsibility to understand this.
Garboth 1 year ago
Agree 100% with Rothbard critique. Rothbard laid forth a complete nonsequitur.
Sepero1 1 year ago
Natural rights is species bound, so all members of a species will have the same rights. So the cut-off would be the ancestor that could not mate with current humans, provided that ancestor was not denied fertility.
DevinBigSeven 1 year ago
Very well spoken, Austrolibertarian!
ormnotme 1 year ago