Lion King - Climate Change
Uploader Comments (Wildelark)
Top Comments
-
Excllent video,I think the kids would relate to it,well done.
-
Very cool! Very nice job! I'm honored! - I aM 4 Who yoU aRe
All Comments (14)
-
You'd might as well be arguing with a Christian on whether or not God is real. If someone believes in something that you cannot definitely prove is false, just shut your mouth, because you're wasting my time.
-
@Wildelark so you'd rather blindly throw your money at something that isn't real than do some research?
-
John R. Christy has been accused of recanting his position that climate change is neither Anthropogenic nor Catastrophic, but he didn’t. He used two independent data sets, weather balloon and satellite. (see links in my about me) Later he only stated that there was some anthropogenic impact that could not be predicted 100 years out, but that what we’re doing was good for the plants.
-
2/2 Obama's Former Green Jobs Czar and Communist, Van Jones
Admits Left is 'PRETENDING' Need for Regulations in Green Movement
watch?v=bgKr480RYc4
-
1 /2 Obama stop offshore drilling until it was reinstated. This could cause a $5 a gallon increase, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. Cap and Trade (American Power Act) would increase gas prices increase by $2.58 a gallon according to George C. Marshall Institute& taxes on the average household up to $3200 according to the RNC Foreign countries price gouge w/ gas prices to $10/gal!.
.
Allen West 2012
-
Wow! Volume is now measured in square kilometers! I wonder why data from GRACE is interpreted in CUBIC km when reporting ice loss VOLUME from the Greenland ice sheet. Total loss for years 2007 and 2008 were 440 cubic km.
The perennial ice, more than 1 year old in the Arctic Ocean is all but gone.
You don't have a clue of the difference between area and volume. Both are important when discussing polar ice masses.
-
Right or wrong, I'd rather spend money than risk the irreversable damage I really could be causing.
-
And you base your findings on...?? How about researching both sides of the argument? That's right, there is another side. One which is based on science. You have been lied too. Don't be a sucker. Prove me wrong. Swindle, myth, scam, hoax whatever. It's a massive lie and people need to know about it. People are not to blame for weather fluctuation's. CO2 is not to blame. It's the SUN which controls the weather. This is a scam to make you pay a Global carbon tax. Look it up.
i like it a lot nice job
EternalLight1992 2 years ago
Thanks!
Wildelark 2 years ago