Three MITEs & Zubek
Loading...
Loading...
53
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (dekay5555555)
see all
All Comments (5)
-
You have positive and the negative Mite, your explanations are very very skewed, actually we are surprised that you actually just do not get it ,your explanation is fool of holes, good enough for -S- not for geometry.
-
12.52 laps of this vid. I started at 1-F- you at 2-F- get it strait.
-
10.30 laps this video, F tet. so you just do not get it, that's fine, this reg. tet. is 1/8 of your 2- F tet.
-
No, no , no, you still do not get it, the 1/4 reg. tet. mod. in my scheme build the whole hier. whereas your 1/4 reg. tet. does not build anything absolutely nothing, my 8 = to your 12 you mumbling nonsence
Loading...
4:41
Pythagorass progression part -1by ElusiveCube101 views- 3:48
Pythagoras progression part-6by ElusiveCube87 views
- 8:31
Pythagorass progression part -5by ElusiveCube103 views
- 8:13
Pythagorass progression part- 4by ElusiveCube77 views
- 5:28
Pythagoras progression part -3by ElusiveCube89 views
- 6:06
Controling Varroa Mites in Bee Hives, Naturallyby fineshooter871 views
- 1:43
Find the Largest of Three Numbersby blcandido96 views
- 9:31
E= PQR Introducing the peculiar E modulesby dekay555555526 views
- 6:08
Club Penguin A Sad Pookie Story Part Threeby MissBerryCupcakesCP173 views
- 9:01
Pt-4-, 3 kind of concentric hierarchies same outcomeby ElusiveCube56 views
- 3:33
Buckminsterfullereneby dekay555555523 views
- 8:01
three synergetics Mite = nothingby ElusiveCube62 views
- 6:22
Pythagoras progression part -2by ElusiveCube116 views
- 6:13
Pt-2-, 3 kind of concentric hierarchies same outcomeby ElusiveCube64 views
- 4:18
Pt.-1-, 3 kinde of concentric hierarchies same outcomeby ElusiveCube85 views
- 8:07
Music of the Spheresby ElusiveCube110 views
- 5:49
Pt-3-, 3 kind of concentric hierarchies same outcomeby ElusiveCube64 views
- 9:55
MITES part 3by ElusiveCube54 views
- 1:05
Home of the Cuppler Animationby ElusiveCube109 views
- 11:36
Sub assemblies made of PQRby dekay555555515 views
No, Frank, I get it. You require an a priori existence of the Synergetics cube, then you can halve the edge. A cube has an edge = "a". You say 1/6 cube derives your units. Each and every one of your units is compose of A&B modules. 72 A&B modules make a cube edge = "a". All that you are doing is saying if Synergetics uses edge "a" cube, then you say your cube edge is "a"/2. Thus 1/8 of the volume. Merely a childish maneuver and very disingenuous.
dekay5555555 2 months ago