Philosophy of values & ethics w/ Nigel Warburton: How to choose the right ethics
Loading...
3,431
Loading...
Uploader Comments (standstrongtv)
see all
All Comments (6)
-
It's nice to see Nigel at the other end of the mike!
-
I think Professor Warburton is misrepresenting moral relativism. Many moral relativists don't say that all moral viewpoints are equally valid everywhere and all the time; they just say that comparing moral views across vastly different societies can be difficult or impossible and that the idea of Absolute Truth is a fiction. It's NOT the same as nihilism. The kneejerk reaction against postmodernism is understandable for most people but from a professional philosopher, this is annoying
-
it's weird to actually "see the voice" of Philosophy bites
-
yeah, nigel warburton! Great interview.
Loading...
Nigel states that a subjective moralist won't be reflective at all about what she's done. But that's clearly false - that's just amorality. A subjective moralist will have an idea what is right and wrong for her, and in no way does that imply that her actions are will reveal her true moral code. That would be a reductive morality of revealed intention. She may not believe that her moral code extends beyond herself, but that doesn't mean she won't be able to asses whether she's transgressed it.
MikeDrewYT 1 year ago
@MikeDrewYT Perhaps it would be a good to ask Nigel. His twitter handle (if you use) is twitter dot com/philosophybites
Best,
Filip
standstrongtv 1 year ago