Pro-Choice to Pro-Life . . . in Seconds!

Go to http://www.180movie.com/

What was spoken to these people that made them change their minds? They went from being Pro-Choice to being Pro-Life in a matter of seconds. Find out at http://www.180movie.com/

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Abortion
• 180
• 180 Movie
• Ray Comfort
• Prolife
• Prochoice
• Pro-Choice
• Pro-Life
• Planned Parenthood
• Heart Changer
• Rick Perry
• Pregnancy

[TELLEMENT1000]

@WerewolfOfTheWater This is the most convoluted logic. If banning abortion created incentive to rape, then allowing abortion would create a DISincentive to rape; nonetheless, rapes still occur. Rapists do not rape to get reproductive rights; reproduction is likely the LAST thing on a rapist's mind. So no, Republicans do not want this crazy scenario of providing more "reproductive rights" to rapists. How absurd. They simply want the right to life of the unborn to be recognized.

[FongioHELS]

an unwanted fetus has no ill intent of course - like a parasite, it's just doing what it naturally has to do - but the physical risks of pregnancy and its total disruption to a woman's body and life means the fetus is not harmless, and therefore not innocent

[FongioHELS]

@MayonR well mutations and parasites are naturally occurring. they are just doing what they were meant to do. do you consider cancer innocent?

[MayonR]

@FongioHELS [[its total disruption to a woman's body]] it's a naturally occurring process, disruption just suggests inconvenience.[[fetus is not harmless]] Woman have had babies for eons which is beneficial to survival.[[not innocent]] A bay has not yet sinned therefore innocent.

[FongioHELS]

futhermore, even if a fetus has a right to life, a pregnant woman is not required to save it by loaning out her body for nine months against her will. since pregnancy entails profound physical, psychological, and long-lasting consequences for a woman - it is not a mere "inconvenience" - her freedoms are significantly restricted if she is forced to carry to term.

[FongioHELS]

@thewayofthemaster Although you could call a fetus a "potential person," a potential person cannot have personhood rights either, in the same way that a 6-year old cannot obtain a driver's license just because he's a potential 16-year old. Potential persons have only potential rights, not actual rights.

[FongioHELS]

@thewayofthemaster fetuses are not defenseless; they have their mother. a woman does not simply terminate a pregnancy because it's inconvenient or unplanned, it is a serious consideration with herself and her doctor. nobody else can decide for her.