SATANISM AND THE CIA part-2

In his documentary film "Satanism and The CIA", Ted Gunderson shows the link between satanic ritual abuse, drug trafficking and the international trafficking in children by the CIA.
Ted Gunderson is former head of the FBI, Los Angeles, California.
In this clip, his assistant Linda Weegan shares her own personal experience with satanism. THIS IS REAL FOLKS and there are an estimated 3 million satanists in the United States alone. THINK ABOUT THAT......

Visit Ted's website at:
http://www.tedgunderson.com/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• FBI
• CIA
• SATANISM
• CHILD
• TRAFFICKING
• SATANIC
• RITUAL
• ABUSE

[contactkim]

This is real. It happened to me in 1994. As an adult. drugged, raped, electroshocked so that I wouldn't remember... do not doubt for a second: This is real. I am a woman who divorced a 33rd degree freemason "Jew"... So sad, so true. So unbelievable unless it has happened to you or someone that you love.

[Cheesesteakfreak]

Why don't the people in the background stfu???

[candistyx]

Did she just blood libel?

[candistyx]

@contactkim If you were "drugged" and "electroshocked" not to remember, how do you know?

[SuperKevinheart]

@glimglim1 Go to a boxing match and look at how people react, they act like animals they scream they shout they call out names its abusive behavior. Go to a school and you see statues of war heroes and tanks being displayed. So as you can see we are not yet civilized we have dangerous tendencies. Its a sick world that we live in.

[SuperKevinheart]

@glimglim1 I don't know much about Ted Bundy I will look up about it. I think I know what you mean for example sociopaths if you show them a gory violent film showing blood and gruesome scenes they don't react to it at all they are not showing emotions or feelings. Sure they mimic their heroes they tend to develop multiple personality disorders. But something must have triggered that emotion which was building up for a long long time.

[glimglim1]

@58trainwreck Please, show me the research. Give me every link and video and testimony you can think of.

[glimglim1]

@SuperKevinheart I understand the angle you're approaching this from and appreciate your sincerity in presenting it. But your point doesn't take into account the virtually unanimous agreement in psychiatry that sociopaths are born without the necessary component to empathize or feel emotion, which is why they learn to mimic the emotions and behaviors of those in their lives. Ted Bundy had no brutal home life. He had a traumatic revelation about family, but not childhood abuse that I can recall.

[SuperKevinheart]

@glimglim1 For example what we consider today immoral was considered moral by ancient cultures a thousand years ago. Cannibalism is still practiced by tribal people for them this practice is considered normal for us it's considered immoral and criminal. Now you may be inclined to call these people evil.

Evil and Good doesn't tell me anything a Good person a thousand years ago who was considered an ethical human being by his peers and followers today he would be considered criminal.

[SuperKevinheart]

@glimglim1 We need to understand human behavior. What are the factors that shape human behavior?? If I was raised in an environment that taught brutality I would be a brutal person. It is the conditioning of the human mind that makes it respond to such acts.

Good and Evil are established points of view however all systems are emergent not established you come into this world not knowing anything.

[SuperKevinheart]

@glimglim1 If I was the first one to come up with this concept I would have been an author selling books. Why are you calling me Webster?? People talk about good and evil as if they studied the whole thing they believe that it is natural people who are evil are born that way. And if you come from a religious background then its obvious that you believe in the concept of bad and good. I am talking about it because the concept of good and evil is misleading.

[glimglim1]

@SuperKevinheart Okay, Webster. Then let's do away with language altogether then since you've clearly forbidden us from 'labelling anything.' All words are made with the intended purpose of describing something we do not understand. We give it a name so we can identify it for future reference. You think you're the first one to come up with this 'no such thing as good or evil' argument? If good and evil don't exist, then why are you talking about it???