@bearhaulin120 O Dear God, where to begin, please be informed before u try to make a point (OH no! i typed u instead of you...what a moron i must be)
1st. There is absolutely no such thing as two much oxygen in our atmosphere, in fact its one of the few chemicals that are absolutely essential to our survival. What were you thinking would happen, some sort of oxygen overdose lol.
2nd. we dont need to be concerned with providing CO2 for trees. there is currently plenty to go around.
let me say something to you,did i violate your creed by actually spelling correctly?
trees need carbon dioxide and they produce oxygen and therefor of there were more trees there would be too much oxygen and if there was less trees there would be not enough oxygen for the ever growing population of this planet including animals.
if there was too much carbon dioxide in the air the trees would be too big and make too much oxygen so how the hell are we supposed to keep it at a certain level?
What color is YOUR neck?
MrGameOrWatch 4 months ago
@ManuelC572 not in the North America
surredneck66 4 months ago
which one is which
matthewtchernev123 6 months ago
Wtf, don't these have a speedlimiter? How fast can they go?
ManuelC572 10 months ago
@bearhaulin120
3rd. WTF do trees have to do with the ozone layer?!
4th. The problem with carbon dioxide is rising global temperatures due to the greenhouse effect.
5th Liberal Fascists LOLOLOLOL u fail at politics
6th.I never mentioned any studies, but i can if u would like me to.
7th. I'm all for having a little a fun, but its important to keep these things in mind, and do our damage in moderation
Jeez, all this over what was orginally a joke
good try
Me820694 1 year ago
@bearhaulin120 O Dear God, where to begin, please be informed before u try to make a point (OH no! i typed u instead of you...what a moron i must be)
1st. There is absolutely no such thing as two much oxygen in our atmosphere, in fact its one of the few chemicals that are absolutely essential to our survival. What were you thinking would happen, some sort of oxygen overdose lol.
2nd. we dont need to be concerned with providing CO2 for trees. there is currently plenty to go around.
3rd. cont...
Me820694 1 year ago
let me say something to you,did i violate your creed by actually spelling correctly?
trees need carbon dioxide and they produce oxygen and therefor of there were more trees there would be too much oxygen and if there was less trees there would be not enough oxygen for the ever growing population of this planet including animals.
if there was too much carbon dioxide in the air the trees would be too big and make too much oxygen so how the hell are we supposed to keep it at a certain level?
bearhaulin120 1 year ago
@bearhaulin120 im sorry, did i violate ur creed by giving a shit about something other than trucks guns and lynryd skynyrd?
Me820694 1 year ago
@dayday913 lol at the hole in the ozone layer
Me820694 1 year ago 2
lol at the hole in the exhuast
dayday913 1 year ago