Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Paulding Light Debunked

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
16,667
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 22, 2010

Fact or Faked was FAKED!!! Here is the explanation of the "Paulding Light Mystery" .

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 51 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (NuitFilms)

  • @dharvell,

    @gregg11b32

    Check out this video: youtube DOT COM /watch?v=YKIQ8DpWC_Q&NR=1

    It's better than mine and shows the proper experiment that Fact of Faked never did, because Fact or Faked was not interested in "facts" in this particular case.

  • @ dmbfan1969 there is a reason why the scientific community regards eyewitness accounts as the least reliable evidence. your eyes can fool you into thinking all kinds of things, like the sun revolving around the earth, which makes perfect sense if all you have is eyewitness accounts, but that's why we have science.

    for everyone else, there has been much better debunking videos posted since I put this up, check'em out, they are really good and prove the headlight theory to be the right one.

see all

All Comments (155)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the distance from the viewing spot is way to far from where they're showing the car path there's no way you could see head lights from that far away

  • ALL that shows is your cross eyed munky oppinion and point of view, open your left eye and try it again!

  • I think that the distance of the "car light" is way too long, for the people to believe that its the paulding light. So you are telling us that a car remains still for about 2 or 3 hours in the same place? I dont believe you. Your explanation its a goofy one. Think more carefully.

  • I stood there for two hours (supposedly they were out at that time for the last few nights) during the "perfect" time to see them. Even a blind person could see they were just headlights. I felt more dumb after going there.

  • @anticca90

    Thats not The Paulding lights. Again, all lights are not the same.

  • @burninbiomass 1936 Kansas Star; 1947 the book Ozark Superstitions; 1958 The Ford Times are the first published accounts.

  • @anticca90

    Find me a report before the 60's, and then we will talk.

    Your error is in thinking any light worldwide is caused by the same thing. If someone cant explain a light in Florida or Tennessee it doesn't mean that a light in Michigan cant be explained. I'm not saying every "spooklight" in the world is fake (I believe in the supernatural myself, this just isn't it). have been her and saw the cars. Additionally, Michigan Tech has proven this is car lights quite clearly.

  • @burninbiomass regardless of when this particular light was first reported, it may have been there long before; and it is only a theoretical "debunking" as you cannot prove a negative, especially when, in similar cases, the debunking theory has been certainly disproved.

  • @anticca90

    I have no idea what a hornet spooklight is. The Paulding light was first reported in the 60's however.

  • @burninbiomass same with the Hornet Spooklight which was reported in the mid 1800s right???

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more