Noah's Ark Expedition on Mount Ararat - Reported April 27, 2010
Uploader Comments (patrickmcintyre)
All Comments (65)
-
but that is still not the evidence that fucking wood is noah's ark! You are misleading people with you retarded argument.
-
and do you people know what the meaning of the rainbow stands for?!
-
@paulofighters and how come you doubt what GOD makes and unmakes?
-
maybe theres more than one ark theres a lot of animals in the world
-
Mar 10:27 And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
-
Boat would not have to float up 13,000 feet. According to the Psalms, God raised the mountains and lowered the valleys. That's where the water "went." It's still here. Pressures of added water created great earthquakes and mountains poked up out of the water, and since the "bowels of the deep" were emptied, the oceans settled deeper as the land gave way and allowed the continents to be water-free. This is why you can also find sea shells in the High Sierras.
-
the waters we see now called ocean is from the great flood
Mate, you are taking into account Tectonics, uplifting, erosion and weathering.
"The Ark" could've been laid at sea level and raised by uplifting of the surface. The Ararat area is an area known for tectonics, also it is very hard to justify water coming out of the surface, I mean below the surface.... that would lower the Earth's crust.
Your assumptions do not take the basics of Thermodynamics, how can a huge amount of water come from heavens and then vanish?
paulofighters 3 months ago
Hello paulofighters-
These discussions are fun as long as we don't take ourselves too seriously. The earth could potentially hold enough water for 100 floods that could cover the tallest mountain. But there are pressure, heat and molten core issues. For the latest theory, you can read the National Geographic article at h t t p : / / n e w s . n a t i o n a l g e o g r a p h i c . c o m / n e w s / 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 / 0 3 0 7 _ 0 3 0 7 _ w a t e r w o r l d . h t m l Thank you for your comment.
patrickmcintyre 3 months ago
does that mean the ark wasn't real?
BMWM3GTRLOVER 8 months ago
Hello BMWM3GTRLOVER-
I assume you meant to ask "does that mean the latest ark "discovery" wasn't real?" My video leaves open the possibility that the current "discovery" is a hoax. My video does not dispute that there was an ark and a flood. My video provides an answer to those who say a worldwide flood that covered all land could not have happened because they say there's not enough water on earth to cover the mountains.
patrickmcintyre 8 months ago
Hello Patrick,
I don't understand the last line ' 13 000 ft over the entire surface of the earth is less than 1 % of the earth' s holding capacity"
Well I 'm not a native speaker but does that mean that water could rise above the mountain peak in the case of flood lifting the ark to mount peak ?
Which means that even the highest mountain would be totally coverd, submerged ?
Is that right ?
Thank you for the video :)
MrsRoseSteven 1 year ago
Hello MrsRoseSteven-
Yes, the earth could hold enough water for 100 floods that could cover the tallest mountain. But there are pressure, heat and molten core issues. For the latest theory, you can read the National Geographic article at h t t p : / / n e w s . n a t i o n a l g e o g r a p h i c . c o m / n e w s / 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 / 0 3 0 7 _ 0 3 0 7 _ w a t e r w o r l d . h t m l Thank you for your comment.
patrickmcintyre 1 year ago