Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Antonio Salieri: 26 Variations on 'La Follia di Spagna' 2nd version (1/2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,561
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 16, 2009

I have already uploaded a slower version of this stunning piece which, in my opinion, does it more justice than this faster version. However, compare for yourselves and enjoy!

Matthias Bamert conducts the London Mozart Players.

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Astardis)

  • I don't understand why these people call themselves "the Mozart Players" because as far as I can hear, they play in modern style, not historically informed.

    I think there should be rules of how far one can go with such names, like this name says; "We are experts playing Mozart as Mozart should be played...." But that's wrong, they play in modern philharmonic style... They should have been named "the Modern Mozart Players" or what think would fit better ; "The Mozart Slayers"

  • I get your point - but do you really think Bach - whom I think of as THE greatest ever - would have performed music prior to his days on old instruments?

Top Comments

  • My problem is WHO THE FUCK CARES ABOUT MOZARTNUS MAGNUS WULFGANGUS!

    THIS IS SALIERI!

see all

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Astardis The answer is NO. Bach invented the Viola Pomposa and the Lute Harpsichord (amongst other things). I do so hate snobby "Purists" who are uninformed about classical music and treat it like THE GOSPEL. Bach was famous for transcribing his ouvres to other instruments and keys (the French Ouvertures for orchestra for example ) and the D minor Toccata and Fugue , most likely a piece by violin in A minor and trnascribed by a student under Bach's tutelage is another example. Great retort BTW!

  • @paqman67 Salieri did not teach those people... oh and to counter your point against Mozart; the reason he is regarded as such a "great composer", is because his compositions were "perfect" - in the sense (theory-wise) that there were no musical mistakes, no misplacement of notes, or misarrangement of sections or lines. He did this so well that he could write a single copy without a mistake - also you can read any of his work upside down, and it reads perfectly. He aslo had perfect pitch.

  • @KarlAmade Ultimately we can never know how people played music in the 18th century. Academics burying their heads in 18th century books certainly won't let us know.

  • @paqman67 I totally agree with you. Mozart's music can be quite nice, but it's just a sweet cake covered with frosting when compared to Baroque music: I dislike classical period in general. But Salieri is for me an exception and I believe he's really underestimated and in the shade of Mozart superstar.

  • @paqman67 You never met Mozart "the man" and you never will. Are you sure you don't mean you don't like Tom Hulce? Reading Mozart's letters is one of the most enjoyable non-musical parts of studying music. The guy could write in 4 languages, expound about algebra, was extremely witty in both german and Italian, and left valuable observations about the Golden Age of Viennese music.

    It is useless to expound on the impact Mozart has had on music. He is the crown jewel of our music culture

  • @andymccoy10 I guess I don't think much of Mozart the man and I have trouble separating him from his music. I was, what some musicologists call "Being Provocative" :D, which means I was being a total Pr*ck A'hole..sorry if I offended you..lol! I do have Mozarts complete symphonies & childhood symphonies + the Requiem.. I hate Opera, so I only have a few snippets of his Operas.. I do have monteverdi's Opera "Orfeo" in it's entirity...somewhere in my garage buried under 500 other classical CD's.

  • @paqman67 You mean the symphonies he wrote from the time he was 9 until he was in his early teens? They're better than Salieri's symphonies, that's certain. I am not interested in your class interpretation of the classical style, but I would suggest you read Charles Rosen's book on it, and just realize that the Classical Style, as embodied by Mozart, Haydn, and Beethoven, essentially defined all the classical music that followed.

    Are you trying to be a Marxist musicologist, lol?

  • @andymccoy10 Nah, I just think he is over rated....try listening to some of his early symphonies (before the 25th) and there's not much excitement. I really think that the main fault is not Mozart, but just that "Classical" style was simply written for rich idiots who wanted background music while they counted their golden Ducats. In Baroque times, the composer assumed that listeners were also musicians and not rich dimwits. Salieri was teacher: Beethoven,Mozart's children & Liszt for a reason.

  • @paqman67 Salieri isn't underrated. He's right where he should be. A minor figure in musical history, a competent 18th century composer of light comic opera and slightly more substantial historical dramas. Oh, yes, without Salieri, where on earth would be????? lol,

    Your comments about Mozart are equally unenlightening. You are, as the great one would say, a musical idiot. 

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more