Fried is very dominant in this discussion it is as if he is battling with Clark's very existence and repuation as a social historian of art rather than engage with him - Pollock was a bad place to start - they should have used Manet as the focus of the discussion as there was some common ground on Manet whereas there was very little substantive common gound on Pollock.
Fried is very dominant in this discussion it is as if he is battling with Clark's very existence and repuation as a social historian of art rather than engage with him - Pollock was a bad place to start - they should have used Manet as the focus of the discussion as there was some common ground on Manet whereas there was very little substantive common gound on Pollock.
IrishClaudius 1 week ago
legends!
BlidaruAdriana 3 months ago