The Scientific Precision of the Qur'an

Hay DIGITISED and ADeepVoiceyp u both can watch this video of
Dr Zakir Naik Vs Dr William Cambell
on youtube, and i m sure if you are really OPEN for the truth you will find one.

Zakir Naik denies evolution because its called the 'theory of evolution'.
He has about an inch more scientific credability then kent hovind im afraid. Hes a medical doctor not a scientist.

He tried to say that swine was haram because of diseases which only allah knew about. Yet it was banned to jews long before... and due to disease.

Pork is bad for us these days because of modern farming, it would otherwise be a safe but slightly fatty meat if it wasnt for hormone drug feed.

correction -

i meant to say...and *NOT* due to disease.

It was banned to jews because of a technicality in moses law. Animals which are forbidden cannot have both cloven hooves and chew cud.

Pigs have cloven hooves BUT dont chew cud, which meant pigs were off the menu.
No health reason, not hygiene reason (pigs are very clean compared to other farm animals), not disease...and certainly not artificial growth hormones.

Zakir Naik shamelessly gropes around for his 'miracles'.

If he knew pigs were unhealthy (being a medical doctor...) he should take 30 mins at least to research why this is.

But he doesnt care or he is dishonest, he knows people are desperate for confirmation of miracles in the quran, exactly the same as christians are for miracles in the bible.

They have found just as much support for their delusions too.
Great flood? 6000 year old earth? Jesus being god?
Yes its all 100% scientifically supported*


* - only by christian fundamentalists

islamic - awareness . org

@RachZi

When is judgement day?

If you are talking about the vague.."soon!!" then you need to realise that people have been waiting for it for about 1700 years since revelations was accepted as biblical canon.

So give me a date, or accept that you are making intellectually bankrupt claims.
All statements of fact must be falsifiable, or else they are fallacious and as such nonsense.

So tell me when or refrain from making such claims.

@RachZi

You're welcome to present the evidence via pm to me or any other method. I'll be swayed by evidence, I won't be swayed by personal convictions.

Keith Moore does discuss the quran yes, although for all his wonder and amazement of the scripture he has not converted to islam.

Rather odd if he truly believes this to be divine revelation wouldnt you say?

However important Dr Moore is, one mans personal opinion or authority does not constitute objective evidence. It is anecdotal especially in light of all the material written on embryology which mohammed could have come into ear-shot of.

@digitised

Harun Yahya got refuted a long time ago, Where have you been?

Oh i know all about Haryn Yahya and his cult.

And for all the muslims here who think he is an authority on islam and the quran, he has spoon fed his followers into believing that he is the Mahdi. He discusses the Mahdi extensively on all his websites and tries to draw subtle comparisons between himself and this messiah.

He also claims he was educated in philosophy at university, when he really studied interior design, and dropped out.

And all of his claims are debunked, I know.