Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ramayan: Oct 5, 2010

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
25,541
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 27, 2010

Ramayan is a tale for every generation. It is multi-layered, multi-faceted, multi-dimensional... and this new daily version of the timeless classic has been interpreted to cater to the taste of a shining, modern India. Television is all about great stories well told, and for us, Ramayan is India's greatest story ever and we hope to re-tell it in a compelling, entertaining manner.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dkanake1 Money has nothing to do with supply, demand, and economy. Money is free for central bank (CB). CB can print any amount of money, at any time it wants, and give it to anybody it wants. That is why everything capitalism produces is wrong and has side effects. Controlling economy using free money cannot support nishkam karma. Without nishkam karma nothing great can happen. For more details visit createmoneylesseconomy site. Capitalism violates all the laws of nature described by Ramayan.

  • @dkanake1 Ok i think i understand what you are trying to say, Capitalism, as the name suggests puts great emphasis on "capital" which in our society today is a monetary value in the form of money. So in order to make more capital you need a greater buying demand, and the only way to make more is through sex hence making more of that buying power which would ultimately mean more money. So in other words you are all for condoms!!!

  • @dkanake1 Clarification: family union is like labor union for capitalism; sex means outside marriage. More sex in schools, colleges, means more divorces. Capitalism sells condoms in schools, creates movies like desperate house wives to promote sex and to reduce family values. Divorcing a family helps to sell two apartments, two TVs, two refrigerators, two cars etc. so more business. Divorcing is like divide and conquer rule of capitalism. Less union allows more exploitation by capitalism.

  • @IdentifiablePerson My apologies, I was thinking this purely from a United States point of view. But i'll still stand by my argument that religion should and in my opinion is prevailing when it comes to instructing how people live their lives, not some monetary based system. Sex is the union of two bodies to create life, so my question is how can it destroy family when in reality it creates it. Sex the very essence of union of a man and woman bound in holy matrimony...

  • @dkanake1 Capitalism is not an economy. It is headed by Central Bank (CB), a very secret & private institution. CB is the modern king. Capitalism violates all laws of nature. So it is false. It creates conspiracies to destroy environment, societies, and human values. Without such destruction a false economy cannot survive. Sex destroys family structure and union. Capitalism does not like union. So it encourages sex to destroy women, which in turn, destroys the foundation of a culture.

  • @IdentifiablePerson Capitalism is a type of economy structure, this is the same mentality people are arguing today and have caused much conflict. So please refrain from that, It is true that sex outside marriage is invalid, but this is a truth in ALL religions, so its not capitalism that causes this.

  • At one time this was the Indian values. Boys and girls cannot have sex before marriage. This is because human body becomes dirty after sex outside marriage. Such bodies cannot be used for holy matrimony. The queen says she was so stupid to give her dirty body to Ram. Home of a married couple is a temple. Dirty people cannot create a temple. It seems we have lost these values. Capitalism is destroying India and its dharma. God bless India.

  • Doesn't that queen comes back in her next appearance on earth as Lord Krishna's queen, Satyabhauma?

  • @Subaru537 yea, but he was supposed to roam the forests, and if he was allowed into other cities, that would've made things WAAAAAY too easy! hahahaha

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan Um I thought he wasn't suppose to go or step foot onto Ayodya (his palace and city). I don't know.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more