Climate Science Debate : Global Warming Alarmist VS. Global Warming Skeptic

Dr. Scott Denning VS. Dr. Roy Spencer .

A balanced respectful climate science debate at last.

July 7, 2011: Scott Denning, PhD, Professor of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University (supporting the dangerous anthropogenic global warming hypothesis) VS. Roy Spencer, PhD, Principal Research Scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville (opposing the hypothesis).
Source :
http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&v...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• climate
• global
• warming
• debate
• Scott
• Denning
• Roy
• Spencer

[coldwarkid007]

If this was really a 'A balanced respectful climate science debate' there would be 99 climate scientists and only 1 climate change 'skeptic' - this would reflect the actual reality in the scientific world.

[Richard482]

In the 90’s The Heartland Institute received funding from the tobacco company Phillip Morris to question, find uncertainties and cast doubt on the science linking second-hand smoke to cancer and other diseases, thus postponing any new regulations. Today the goal is the same, its just the scientific issue and the source of funding which has changed.

[TRUMPHENT]

Dr. Spencer should take a correspondence course. It should have introductory and astronomy in its title. Once, Roy graduated with a gold star, this scientist? will have probably have been introduced to Milankovitch. I'm embarrassed for the the man.

[Efunkable]

denning is a fucking idiot, i only made it to 6:35 "heat in, heat out" yeah thats all it is)

and i almost stopped watching when i saw his whole presentation was in comic sans

[johndaddyo444]

Skeptics outnumber AGW Warmists approximately 9 to 1. Naomi Oreskes distorted the truth by selectively counting papers in certain journal databases which had stopped accepting papers by scientists skeptical about AGW pseudo-science. Now that it is clear from ALL evidence that AGW is false, Oreskes has some 'splainin' to do! Hansen's objectivity went out the window years ago, as evidenced by blocking the entrances to coal mines. AGW Warmists - $25 Billion 2010; Heartland Institute - $7.7 Million.

[sensiblebilly]

@coldwarkid007 if you noticed, the organizer talks in intro to this video about how there would have been many more dissenting opinions keynoting the event if they accepted-- but they're scared to do so because every time someone does they are labeled a "denier" and their career tanks. So much for fair debate.

[sensiblebilly]

@coldwarkid007 negative. the IPCC and scientific community like to censor those who disagree with "consensus". That's how the "consensus" is being made. There is recorded evidence of this happening. Do you personally know 100 climate scientists who agree with the IPCC's views?

[EODsplosion]

I deal like I learn the most when watching a debate between two people who respect eachother. This is great!!

[IFrancyISantosI]

this is ehy i am a sceptic..

my school teacher made it better.

[1000frolly]

Who is this fool Scott Denning who talks to informed scientists like they are in 4th grade?

I would throw the idiot out if that is the best that the AGW camp can come up with.

Where is the fucking evidence for AGW you fool?

[kariolafsson]

Calling this a debate is really stretching the definition of the word...

[Richard482]

@MemberNo2 Whats important is the amount of evidence which supports a theory or idea