O'Donnell Nails Senator On Gun Law

TYT Mobile: http://bit.ly/dNKfpf

New TYT Network channels: http://www.youtube.com/user/tytsports

http://www.youtube.com/user/thetopvlog

New TYT Facebook Page(!): http://www.facebook.com/tytnation

Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/theyoungturks

http://www.theyoungturks.com/membership

DISCOUNTS: http://www.theyoungturks.com/godaddy

FREE Movies(!): http://www.netflix.com/tyt

Note: The above two links are for TYT sponsors.

Read Ana's blog and subscribe at:

http://www.examiner.com/x-5445-Politics-in-Education-Examiner

TYT Network (new WTF?! channel): http://www.youtube.com/user/whattheflickshow

Check Out TYT Interviews http://www.youtube.com/tytinterviews

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• lawrence
• o'donnell
• trent
• franks
• jared
• loughner
• shooting
• arizona
• gun
• shooter
• tackled
• rights
• nra
• second
• amendment
• republican
• congress
• senator
• gabrielle
• giffords
• clip
• rounds
• ammo
• ammunition
• bullets
• reload
• law
• control
• msnbc
• guns
• police
• officers
• last
• word
• tyt
• young
• turks
• cenk
• uygur
• news
• politics

[EastTimor1]

@dazzagazza6969

In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun. Since then, despite dire predictions of "Wild West" showdowns and increased violence and accidents, not a single resident has been involved in a fatal shooting – as a victim, attacker or defender.

[EastTimor1]

@dazzagazza6969

The ironic thing is that the places in America where the crime rates are the highest and mass murders more common, also tend to have the most restrictive gun laws. Do the research and learn instead of sniffing craft glue. That stuff is non-toxic anyways, it won't do you any good.

Outlawing guns is not the solution, unless you want to inhibit law abiding citizens from defending themselves, because that will be the result. I know who the sleepy one is, and it's not me.

[timchandler88]

By law, he couldn't have fired any bullet at people. That law didn't seem to stop him.

[whothaplaya]

Yeah because he would have followed magazine capacity laws. Also they fail to mention Pre- 1994 hi cap magazines were still legal during the ban.

[sammyjs1983]

what if what if what if....cenk what if i wouldnt get arrested for beating the shit out of you them ur ass would be bleeding right now

[TheMob1080]

Wow what an idiot. It was a loaded question, of course he is not happy the guy had 30 bullets, he wished "that specific guy" had no bullets, if he had said yes, the asshole would have yelled "then your glad those people are dead" and cut him out of the topic, if he had said no then he would have spun it so that he was for limiting magazine loads. Gun Control people have no idea what the real world is like and have never been in any kind of dangerous situation.

[bubba102893]

How to arms manufactures make more money selling higher capacity magazines? It seems to me they would make more money if there was a capacity limit, as they would sell more.

[eadad]

"its 2003 and he could have only 10 bullets because of the law" wait what? what kind of fantasy land does the dude on the left live in?

[Joseph090969]

Bust O'Donnell in the mouth, ass!

[professorgentzel]

Obviously, O'donnell can't do counterfactual reasoning very well. Had this happened during an assault weapon ban, we CANNOT conclude that the shooter wouldn't have had a 33 rounder. Just because there's a law there doesn't mean it would stop the offender. It's illegal to shoot members of congress, that didn't stop him from doing so. It's illegal to shoot little girls in a crowd, that didn't stop him. Had crystal meth been illegal, then the meth-head wouldn't have gone on that rampage! Please.

[greygoosevodka1]

he had no argument because its a stupid argument to begin with 

[TheCAHADA]

He could have always dressed up as a mexican drug smuggler and bought the magazine from an ATF agent.....