A Challenge To All Atheists!
Loading...
Loading...
1,334
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Share to:
see all
Video Responses
This video is a response to Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 37) William Lane Craig
Loading...
- 4:40
How Atheists Take Alexander Vilenkin Out Of Contextby drcraigvideos4,919 views
- 4:08
Thunderf00t tries doing philosophyby TheCartesianTheist3,507 views
- 5:07
Why I am not an atheist or theist or agnosticby DeepakChopraGlobal5,698 views
- 20:29
Rant: The Atheist collection plateby AtheismTV1,204 views
- 1:13:35
The Effects of PTSS - Black Atheist Of Atlanta - 12-05-11by WAENTelevision1,218 views
- 14:55
the explanatory scientific methodby junior00bacon00chee1,072 views
- 8:23
The cure for atheism is truth & honesty.by mexicandruglord195 views
- 9:07
To All Christians on YouTubeby azsuperman01223,074 views
- 6:58
Hugh Laurie - The Ellen DeGeneres Show - Feb. 28th 2011by drhouseforum398,751 views
- 1:36:45
Challenge To Atheists Christians Jews Buddhists Hindus American Chinese Japanese Brazilian Indianby fkaah227 views
- 8:36
Atheists vs. Rick Perryby 1metallica189,889 views
- 13:00
We Are Atheismby JokerFan252338 views
- 8:01
This is why atheism produces the most geniuses (part 1)by leviMichealathan156 views
- 6:13
Amazing Atheist Sharted on Your Constitution! and Deleted His Vid!by TheBrainEnema1,270 views
- 0:15
Question #2 to all Atheists.wmvby SATAKARNI9107 views
- 13:54
The Case For A Creator (HD Imagery and Music)by mfshaughnessy98 views
- 7:35
Atheism And Virtueby wayman29136 views
- 58:44
Catholic Pedophilia Failure - The Atheist Experience #737 (full episode)by TheAtheistExperience24,438 views
- 3:09
Multiverse: The atheist's supernatural realmby wwwTrueFreethinker74 views
- 6:09
A Question Atheists can't Answer & Giving the Good Person Test to a Satan Worshipperby Repenttrust2,160 views
Indeed. Physical objects are rather complex in terms of pure experiential phenomenona.
EpicYarnEM 1 month ago
This is not about agreement or disagreement. This is about the fine art of non-contradiction.
However you try to turn this around, a ‘physical object’ will forever be: that which has one - or several, concepts ‘attached’ to it.
And that’s why you can never use this definition to objectively differentiate physical objects from Concepts.
My point all along. Thank you for your time.
fiesta181 1 month ago
Seems more and more agreement is happening, appearances aside.
EpicYarnEM 1 month ago
*Your only way out of this is come up with an exception regime.*
There is another way though: Denial!
(it doesn't always work but it never completely fails)
fiesta181 1 month ago
*shape: that which*
Bla, bla bla… what you need to answer is this: does “shape” exists?
If not, then this is a definition of common speech, utterly irrelevant for any scientific discussion.
fiesta181 1 month ago
*existence: that which is assumed*
Say no more, you might get caught in your own fallacies again.
*it just means you think there is no external existence*
The explanation works just fine without that assumption. I don’t know if there is an external existence or not, that’s what it means.
fiesta181 1 month ago
*that which reduces only to more words*
That’s not circular; that is an infinite regression. Circularity means that an object DEPENDS on another object (an observer) to exist. (Are you sure you have you been reading my comments so far?)
*there is no problem with that*
I read you. It’s just that in the video you suggest that there is, hence the contradiction. Anyway if there is no problem, there is no need to change the definition.
fiesta181 1 month ago
@junior00bacon00chee
*define "model" since you are using it inconsistently.*
A model is comprised of concepts. That is all you need to know. Whether it’s shape or any other concept, if I am using the word inconsistently, so are you. How about you define the word “consistently” before you propose it as a challenge to other Ytubers?
fiesta181 1 month ago