I did. I don't really see it, but...well, I'll answer like Edward R. Murrow used to answer his mail when someone would tell him what an idiot he was (I know you're not doing that...yet!): "Dear Sir or Madam: You may be right."
I do think Ernie probably hit the ball better 10 years ago than he does now, though. Or maybe it was just the bloom of youth.
You think so? I don't see it. His plane flattens a shade--something you see in a lot of great strikers--but I don't see that little lift-and-open-the angle move.
Look at those shoulders staying turned so long into the downswing (back's at the target--indication that arms are in a true swinging motion instead of shoulders dragging the arms). Also, you'll notice he didn't have that Jay Sigel-esque bounce at the top that he has now...I really wonder what's up with that.
I did. I don't really see it, but...well, I'll answer like Edward R. Murrow used to answer his mail when someone would tell him what an idiot he was (I know you're not doing that...yet!): "Dear Sir or Madam: You may be right."
I do think Ernie probably hit the ball better 10 years ago than he does now, though. Or maybe it was just the bloom of youth.
emncaity 3 years ago
look very carefully then you'll notice LOL
yashank1 3 years ago
You think so? I don't see it. His plane flattens a shade--something you see in a lot of great strikers--but I don't see that little lift-and-open-the angle move.
emncaity 3 years ago
he has that little "weird bounce" here too. LOL
yashank1 3 years ago
Look at those shoulders staying turned so long into the downswing (back's at the target--indication that arms are in a true swinging motion instead of shoulders dragging the arms). Also, you'll notice he didn't have that Jay Sigel-esque bounce at the top that he has now...I really wonder what's up with that.
emncaity 4 years ago
oooooooo nice
schun2008 4 years ago