Blackbox - 01 - SkyCrime - Part 3 of 5
Loading...
Loading...
17,268
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 10:00Blackbox - 01 - SkyCrime - Part 5 of 5by bjones415,416 views
- 9:57Blackbox - 01 - SkyCrime - Part 4 of 5by bjones414,621 views
- 9:57Blackbox - 04 - Wing and a Prayer - Part 2 of 5by bjones421,156 views
- 9:53Blackbox - 02 - Deadly Weather - Part 5 of 5by bjones421,427 views
- 10:51British Airways 737-436 G-DOCE Arriving at MANby bjones4465 views
- 2:01PAN AM flight 103.by kevin211193165,585 views
- 14:49easyJet A320-214 G-EZTN arriving at LGWby bjones4529 views
- 9:49Blackbox - 05 - Blaming the Pilot - Part 3 of 5by bjones443,860 views
- 14:58easyJet A320-214 G-EZTN departing ACEby bjones4587 views
- 13:41Thomson 757-28A G-OOBD arriving at SSHby bjones4424 views
- 11:41Thomson 757-28A G-OOBD departing LGWby bjones4558 views
- 9:57Blackbox - 01 - SkyCrime - Part 2 of 5by bjones424,387 views
- 9:57Pan Am Flight 103 | Lockerbie Disaster (Part 1)by Dendiol138,589 views
- 9:45Blackbox - 01 - SkyCrime - Part 1 of 5by bjones443,569 views
- 9:00The Last Flight to Kuwait - Part 1 of 10by bjones463,458 views
- 9:47Blackbox - 05 - Blaming the Pilot - Part 2 of 5by bjones470,237 views
- 0:21Crash Scene - Pan Am 103 Explosion - Lockerbieby AuroraHazel116,683 views
- 5:37PSA Flight 1771: Eerily Similar To Shanksvilleby buddhaglass12,128 views
- 9:31Totally Enormous Extinct Dinosaurs - Live Black...by roundhouseblackbox7,544 views
- 3:16Black Box Of History Promo 01by orlandomazzota1,930 views
@elladomtender well said
FightWorldGovernment 4 months ago
@ghpink The U.S government can do anything mate. They can set up anything, produce any evidence, wipe people off the face off the earth. Do not ever underestimate the CIA. Stop being so daft and so naive to think that your own country cannot do this to you. History tells us they have in the past and planned to do it in the future. The thing is- even if an independent group of people wanted to investigate 9/11- they couldnt. The evidence has either been destroyed or its unavailable!
elladomtender 1 year ago
@elladomtender I can send you the links all privately of his conviction and the evidence found and how they found it. Its all in the public domain. How do you explain all the evidence collected? How do you explain that a jury of his peers convicted him? There is tons of evidence, and I am not too sure why you are ignoring it, other then you haven't bothered to research it and don't know its there. So I can't believe your statement? So what are you saying? They corrupted all 12 jurors?
ghpink 1 year ago
@elladomtender I think the only conspiracy here is Bush linked Bin Laden to Saddam Hussien and they entered an illegal war because of that. There were no WMDs found and even the head of the CIA believed he was duped by Bush. That is where the conspiracy ends for me. So answer this. You say there is no evidence, well then have you studied the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui who was convicted in 911? You are saying now that our court system is corrupt and all the peers who convicted him are corrupt?
ghpink 1 year ago
@ghpink There is absolutely NO evidence to suggest those who the govt claim to be involved, were involved. No one has ever been charged. Infact, following the money trail and the reasoning behind why the govt would create a false flag is far more plausable!! The govt and federal authorities are far more to blame than anyone else. And i agree totally with you about using it to start an illegal war, without 9/11- there would have been no catalyst. Now i like you! Now you are making sense.
elladomtender 1 year ago
@elladomtender I questioned the official story as well. The only difference is, I took the time to read the material. I have answered all the questions you raise, for myself and I dont need to prove that 911 was a controlled demolition or was an inside job. There is way too much evidence to show that its not. I have found however that there is evidence it was used to start an illegal war in Iraq and that is what I focus on. I suggest you study the trial of: zacarias moussaoui
ghpink 1 year ago
@ghpink Like i said, if you had read wider than you claim, then we wouldnt be having this conversation. It only takes commonsense to question the official story, and it takes intellect to see that its a farce. I am happy for you to keep putting all your faith in NIST, a half baked report full of holes. If it only investigated the 'chance' of a controlled demolition, it may just be credible! Thing is, shills like you are now in the minority, not just in the U.S but around the world.
elladomtender 1 year ago
@ghpink NIST was appointed by the whithouse, hand picked by the govt. FEMA on the other hand wasnt and NIST completely ignored their suggestions. Sorry but that is bias and a farce and completley negligent. So for you so put all your eggs into NIST, telling me to read it, answering all my claims with "Go read NIST", sorry- but that doesnt cut it. There is so much more info out there than NIST and its clear, although you say otherwise, that you have not read anything but.
elladomtender 1 year ago
@ghpink All you have told me to do is read NIST. You have not suggested anything else. And if you had read more than NIST then i can only take you as completely gullable and stupid. If you read deeper and wider then the official story would stink. You would have far more questions and see far more holes. If you truly believe in your heart that 9/11 is as clear cut as they say it is then i feel sorry for you. The NIST report is bias before the enquiry started because of who was appointed.
elladomtender 1 year ago
@elladomtender AND PS: i never once said NIST is the answer. I just dont discount their side, like you do. If you really want answers, then you need to spend the time and read about BOTH sides, not just the one you feel is right.
ghpink 1 year ago