National interests VS interests of the ruling elite

Svetlana Peunova requested the Supreme Court of the RF to prove consistency of acting Russian elective legislation with Russian constitution, the direct-acting law of the country. The hearing rejected the request: The power did not invent insuperable obstacles for not-approved candidates to have second thoughts.
Earlier Svetlana Peunova was excluded from the list of candidates for submitting not-enough amount of signatures in her support. Interestingly enough, political scientists consider the amount of signatures stated by acting elective legislation impossible for collection in allocated time period, which means, that candidates who met the requested amount (including oligarch Prokhorov) are likely to have committed fraud.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• elections in Russia
• fraud
• prohorov
• putin
• peunova
• politics
• moscow
• merzavcy
• police abuse

[sanubh]

Good

[imbritg]

It is prohibited to broadcast it Russian TV! I'm shocking.

[RitaLindow]

The same sittuation happens in the whole world! when it conserns some small triels court might be objective, but when the trile touches upon the national interests, the Court protects interests of ruling elite! Even if the violation is so obvious and outragious! SO WHERE IS JUSTICE!

[cidavau]

Brave woman! I like the way she said to judge that he is personally liable for the decision.

[poikecy]

Supreme Court in Russia does not represent the real judicial authority, people have a right to demand justice! Svetlana Peunova made it!

[efiuey]

Was the Judge nerves reading the court decision? Seems like)