Male Lap Dogs And Their Feminist Masters

Kate O'Bearn interview part V

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• feminism
• feminists
• feminazi
• radical-feminism
• misandry
• anti-male
• anti-father
• anti-family
• flagging
• christina
• hoff
• sommers
• gender
• quotas
• title
• IX
• larry
• nancy
• hopkins
• men's
• rights
• MRA's
• feminized-schools
• affirmative-action
• carol
• gilligan
• michael
• savage
• phyllis
• chesler
• dennis
• prager

[framboise595]

My adress to boys and men :

You are facing the most vicious attack in all human history. The attack on man is in fact an indirect attack on GOD.

Why is it that hellish feminism has taken so much power in such a few decades ?

Why is it that hellish feminism is now plaguing the church and modern Christianity ?

Why is it that women are so elevated ,that men are no longer the HEAD ?

The answer is : the Bible is DESPISED ,God's will for man and woman has been thrown away

[LadyNemesis2007]

Hi All!

I used to be a feminist until I discovered I was beautiful. Feel free to quote me!

[ROHANDHARESH]

The Myth called Male Power -Feminists have used this word very judiciously to bargain for unwarranted concessions for women from the society.And the fools that men are, they easily bought this stupid argument of men being chauvinistic as well and started giving concessions to women.Before commenting more on this, let me first salute Warren Farrell for inspiring me to write this article and then let’s see what actually does chauvinism mean?Chauvinism means blind and biased devotion to any group.

[ROHANDHARESH]

More often than not men are tainted as being “Male Chauvinistic Pigs” which is quite derogatory a term for any person to accept as negotiating bait, but men did that for they did not have the guts to stand out against feminism and the movement. And feminists very well knew that men have a great urge to prove themselves good, responsible, protecting, providing and understanding. Taking advantage of this, feminists started brow–beating men on values and derogated them.

[ROHANDHARESH]

They did not refrain from writing openly that men should be castrated and justified their horrendous claims with false and horrifyingly exaggerated stories of women torture with a professional finesse.

The worst attack made by feminists on men was that they are “Chauvinistic”. Whatever expectations that the man had from a woman from any relationship, be it parental, sibling or spousal, were invalidated saying that this reflects the “Chauvinistic Behavior” of a man

[ROHANDHARESH]

However, the expectations of a woman were passed off as her RIGHT. This was a very pervert and covert strategy of feminists to snatch the so called ‘power’ from men which never existed in absolute terms to begin with. Realizing the game played, men tried to retain the same non-existent ‘power’ which was again presented as the MAN being powerful and it being a MAN’s world and further concessions were drawn from men in the favor of women.

[ROHANDHARESH]

And the situation so became that women had the choice of either being a professional (a career woman as they prefer to put it) or a homemaker. The man however, had no choice but to take the financial responsibility at the cost of his own aspirations and men have actually done that.

[ROHANDHARESH]

Yet they call men powerful and men buy that argument too, I fail to understand how. Power, as misunderstood, is not the LIBERTY to do something at WILL. Power is the ability to control your own life the way you want and have the choice to do so. Something which men do not have currently, women however have it. Hence it’s the women who are more powerful than men.

[ROHANDHARESH]

It is said that men are biologically powerful than women which is true. But does that define absolute power is the next question one should be asking. And the answer to that question is NO. It, sadly enough, does not define power. Many men think since they are biologically powerful than women, thus the numerous badly drafted, stringent anti–male, women protection laws are justified. It is a sad reality that this also is not true.

[ROHANDHARESH]

It is a sad reality that this also is not true. For women protection laws, the way they are drafted give so much power to women that the men against whom the laws are targeted are virtually and literally left powerless and the poor men have no choice but to either bow down before the woman irrespective of her righteousness or ruin their lives fighting a bogus battle.

[ROHANDHARESH]

So again I fail to understand, how are men powerful?

Men, the feminists argue, have the power to take decisions and since women don’t have this power they are not powerful and hence need protection.

[ROHANDHARESH]

This again is not true. First of all most of the decisions are taken by the women only and moreover if the man takes the decision, then probably that’s what his role is as he has been made the responsible PROVIDER and PROTECTOR. When he has been ascribed to that role, he must have the power to take decisions or otherwise he should be absolved of the role.