Joanne reviews The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science by Richard Holmes. Joanne's Top Model doll is wearing a dress representing something a woman would wear in the mid 1840s.
Just another couple lines, and I won't post any more, in the very near future anyway, =) ; Rosalind Franklin obviously had to deal with the sexist ambient of the time. Great that fraud is always exposed, even if it takes centuries; and yes, of course, science plays a big part on it if applied with reason. I wish I had an eye to eye talk with James Watson, and put him in a situation of contradicting himself...
Those two credited with DNA's structure discovery, I repeat, the manner that I perceived it, don't deserve said credit. Oh yeah, including Wilkins, I believe that is his last name, did not deserve the credit of mentioned discovery. Well, I am sure you know the rest of the story.... The woman that probably deserved all the credit, relative to the Nobel Prize and other credits at the time, yet, very likely as mentioned during my previous message, somewhere, somehow, someone was already was ahead.
Although I understand what you mean, in addition to being a great video of yours, Beauty and terror of science was not really discovered during your mentioned period. Yes, it was accepted by the "scientific community", just like the discovery of the structure of DNA was accepted during the 50s by said community, but in reality there have always been individuals who were ahead in the game, but were not accepted by the "community". Speaking of DNA those two credited for its structure discovery...
From what I can tell, Sarah Palin is hardly competent when it comes to sciences, which is too bad. Hardly someone I consider a science role model at least.
Would it be wrong to suggest dressing your Top Model as a Sarah Palin "Women in Science" action figure? You could always do the Tina Faye version to make the idea more palatable :-)
Just another couple lines, and I won't post any more, in the very near future anyway, =) ; Rosalind Franklin obviously had to deal with the sexist ambient of the time. Great that fraud is always exposed, even if it takes centuries; and yes, of course, science plays a big part on it if applied with reason. I wish I had an eye to eye talk with James Watson, and put him in a situation of contradicting himself...
jjojjorge 1 year ago
Those two credited with DNA's structure discovery, I repeat, the manner that I perceived it, don't deserve said credit. Oh yeah, including Wilkins, I believe that is his last name, did not deserve the credit of mentioned discovery. Well, I am sure you know the rest of the story.... The woman that probably deserved all the credit, relative to the Nobel Prize and other credits at the time, yet, very likely as mentioned during my previous message, somewhere, somehow, someone was already was ahead.
jjojjorge 1 year ago
Although I understand what you mean, in addition to being a great video of yours, Beauty and terror of science was not really discovered during your mentioned period. Yes, it was accepted by the "scientific community", just like the discovery of the structure of DNA was accepted during the 50s by said community, but in reality there have always been individuals who were ahead in the game, but were not accepted by the "community". Speaking of DNA those two credited for its structure discovery...
jjojjorge 1 year ago
From what I can tell, Sarah Palin is hardly competent when it comes to sciences, which is too bad. Hardly someone I consider a science role model at least.
joannema7 2 years ago
Would it be wrong to suggest dressing your Top Model as a Sarah Palin "Women in Science" action figure? You could always do the Tina Faye version to make the idea more palatable :-)
lizfrog62 2 years ago