The last 6 minutes, presented with stoppages cut out, of the November 17th game between the Memphis Tigers and the Kansas Jayhawks.
Seeing as how #2 was featured in a video I did today, featuring #1 as well seems right. The 2008 national title rematch wasn't expected to be close, but some great Memphis fight down the stretch gave them a chance in the final seconds.
As we begin, Kansas (white) leads Memphis (in blue) 44-37, with Memphis having possession of the ball.
Dan Schulman and Dick Vitale have the call.
**All footage belongs to ESPN**
how that kansas team didnt win a title is beyond me, they had 6+ NBA players on the roster
AMart2300 9 months ago
wow still arguing guys?? KU is 3-0 last 3 years against Memphis. If your still blaming the game on stupid things like free throws, effort, etc. then thats pathetic. Your team played hard and lost all 3 years and at the end of the day you just need to realize you lost to a really great program and need to accept the fact your team lost in a fair game...now move on, its a freaking game
ElmoNiteLite2110 1 year ago
@ElmoNiteLite2110 All three on neutral courts, at that.
reformcongress 1 year ago
@ElmoNiteLite2110
You're right Elmo. It wasn't like Mario Chalmers all of sudden became a clutch shooter. It was his MO.
reformcongress 1 year ago
@reformcongress Slowing down doesn't mean they stop trying. It means to slow the pace, but Kansas pushed the pace and dominated that final 2 minutes. Memphis did in fact miss free throws(not because they stopped trying but because they SUCKED AT IT). Kansas made their final 14 free throws. Memphis didn't.
Memphis didn't stop trying. They stopped performing.
reformcongress 1 year ago
@reformcongress we were up by nine with 2 mins left. call told them to slow down douchebag
UglyMuggFilms 1 year ago
@reformcongress kasas city is in missouri dumbass. lawrence kansas is bullshit lol
UglyMuggFilms 1 year ago
@chromifox lol uMad? i still dont see what your problem is. i just stated the facts: memphis has a higher total population as well as a larger number of unique ethnicities. what's wrong with that? so if i am racist for liking diversity, what is your definition of someone who is not a racist? one who rejects diversity? okay then..
chromifox 1 year ago
@chromifox When you implied that Kansas isn't as diverse, it is only for one reason. If you like diversity fine, but don't believe for a second THAT EVERYONE IS LIKE YOU. They aren't. Stop being a dickhead and start being a real man.
reformcongress 1 year ago
@reformcongress lmao. you are saying i am racist because i like diversity. think abotu that for a second. illogical much?
chromifox 1 year ago