Historical Campaign Ad: Windsurfing (Bush-Cheney '04)

This ad provides a humorous take on John Kerry's twisting in the wind

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• bush
• ad
• windsurfing
• kerry
• 2004
• campaign

[DCProductions77]

this was the best ad ever.

[RuflessRecords]

This was probably the most damaging ad of 2004, I remember this one.

[WilliamDRowlett]

Funny ad. Just as funny as Dukakis riding the tank.

[ArcticFoxKit]

So I still feel like the wrong guy got elected.

[joelibermann]

Obama should make his own version of this ad for Romney

He was for healthcare reform, but now he's against it!

[TheBrewchief]

@ThusSpakeDenise Yes, but the Federal Reserve Bank is the mothership for the monster banks and corporations. The Fed is not the citizen's bank, but serves the interests of globalists like the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their banksters. I'm not sure what would have been different without the Fed in 2008, whether the government still would have facilitated the bailouts, but I know the Fed lords over our currency and whores for its pimps, and that's not worth a damn.

[ThusSpakeDenise]

@TheBrewchief Are you kidding? The Monster Banks EXIST so Blood Sucking Vampire Jews can drain America dry. And "The Government" is wholly owned and operated by them.

[TheBrewchief]

@mr19932001 You're right he's not progressive in the traditional sense. I was thinking more from the aspect of social reform, and in some ways, less governance is a new idea given the trend towards the "mommy state". I don't agree with everything he believes either, but I think he is an honest man and not Bilderberg-owned like Perry. As for Wall Street, many of these monster banks that we made even bigger with the bailouts (some used to merge) would have gone under, like they should've.

[kenfo0]

@TheBrewchief YES! There is a basic stupidity and self absorption that is common today, and people think they "win" when they won nothing and actually made a situation worse. After the last election, several black acquaintances talked about how "we" won. I asked them then and now "what did you "win""? They can't answer. They simply say "you're just jealous", which is nonsensical. I can't think of a decent presidential candidate in 20 yrs. A lot of "say one thing, do another" frauds.

[mr19932001]

@TheBrewchief I like and respect Ron Paul, but he's far from progressive. I agree with his views on foreign policy and on the drug war, but some of his economic views are WAT TOO extreame, and while I think the Dept. of Education has its' flaws, I would never abolish it and privatize education like Congressman Paul wants to and he wants to deregulate wall street even more and deregulating it in the first place is one of the main reasons the economic crisis hapened.

[TheBrewchief]

@kenfo0 I agree. People want to bet on the horse they think will win rather than was is right and in the best interests of the nation. Somehow they think that makes them winners if they are on the winning team. I suspect these are the same people that cut people off people in traffic when they see someone else put their blinker on to change lanes. People devoted to "winning".

[TheBrewchief]

@mr19932001 Nader was a great consumer advocate. There is another progressive third party candidate, Ron Paul, a libertarian on the Republican ticket who consistently ranks at the very top or near the top of polls (Indiana and Iowa straw polls, MSNBC poll, the CPAC twice in a row), yet is being eclipsed in the media by Perry and Romney. Seems they do not want people to believe he can win. Probably means he is a the one we need. Vote for the right 1, not just the horse you think will win.