Jarrah White meets Buzz Aldrin

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,681
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 12, 2010

Last month I received quite a few emails informing me of the 2010 Australian Geographic Awards Night, where a piece of digitally remastered Apollo 11 moonwalk footage would be screened and Buzz Aldrin would attend as the guest of honor.

I purchased tickets and asked if it were possible to arrange an interview with Aldrin. The organizers couldn't arrange one, but invited me to attend the press conference the day before the awards ceremony.

During the conference I questioned Aldrin about the Dutch moon rock incident. In October 1969, during their goodwill tour, the Apollo 11 crew gave a moon rock to the then US Ambassador to the Netherlands, J. William Middendorf, who in turn presented it to former Dutch Prime Minister Willem Drees. Last year, the moon rock in question was proven to be a piece of petrified wood.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-b...

It seems the Sydney Morning Herald jumped on my attendance, as on October 6 they released an article alleging that I was an antagonistic gate crasher who needed to be removed by security. These allegations are both false and libelous.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/the-diary/security-we-have-a-problem-20101005-...

To prove that I was not an uninvited, antagonistic interloper or removed from the conference, I am releasing this video showing my invitation to the conference, my exchange with Aldrin and the last few minutes of footage showing that I stayed the whole way through.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (715)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you were being an unbearable twat, of course you should have been removed from the conference. do any of you people honestly believe that if the united states could have destroyed two japanese cities, completely leveled them in a matter of minutes, in the 1940's, that they couldn't fly a tiny piece of metal to the moon and back. what fucking clowns you are. wake up, open your eyes, this is the world you live in.

  • @MadHighway They may have seen planes (which would have been modified, remote control military planes (who would volunteer to fly a plane to their death?) or cruise missiles. did you even watch "September Clues" which shows that the broadcast videos were faked? Or do you work for a military contractor who profited from the War On Terrorizzm?

  • @Daddyo930

    Wow, you believe in holograms in the sky. I didn't know you were in it that far.

    Don't speak for the "competent investigator or scientist"--you are neither, and neither agrees with you.

  • @Daddyo930

    There's no getting through to you. You twist data YOURSELF to conclude there are holograms in the sky, just the same as you twist astronomy to conclude that space is a seething ocean of deadly radiation.

    None of what you say is true, but your self-reinforcing delusion won't admit the possibility.

    Get a university education before you turn 50. Don't waste your life on this conspiracy nonsense.

  • @Daddyo930

    Wow, you actually said that. Yes, we know your penchant for dismissing reality and manipulation of 'facts'--facts you don't understand but keep trumpeting you do.

    Holy crap. People in the street heard jets, looked up, saw jets, yet you say people are on the Star Trek holo-deck.

    Like you are really out to lunch, fella. A tough university program would develop your thinking skills and knowledge so that you'd see your current pseudo-intellectualism in stark clarity.

  • @MadHighway If you believe the data provided by the NTSB, FEMA and NORAD then you would understand that a 767 can't fly 420 or 510 knots at 700 feet. That's impossible. The engines and frame weren't designed for that kind of speed. The plane would literally shake itself out of the sky long before it reached it's target. Eyewitless reports are useless. Try again.

  • @MadHighway Doesn't really matter what they thought they saw. Numbers don't lie. Data from NORAD, FEMA, NTSB and local air traffic control radar say the objects that struck the towers were moving at 420 and 510 knots respectively. I believe those numbers over eyewitness reports any day. So would any competent investigator or scientist.

  • @Daddyo930

    Are you saying NYC pedestrians saw holographic jets? Really?

  • @Daddyo930

    Who's Kirisdevall?

    "When confronted with scientific evidence of cosmic phenomena"--no, your evidence is not scientific, since you've strung together facts you do not understand. That you say experts and education are worthless to you shows how ignorant you are. I'm educated in astronomy; you aren't, and you display it constantly.

    Google is not your friend. You've misled yourself into these beliefs.

  • @khunopie

    Yes, I suppose someone standing on the street who watched planes hit with his own eyes was seeing holograms. Or did you think NYC is devoid of pedestrians?

    Can of Planter's.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more