A Letter On Evolution: 'Religion' Of Evolution

Science & Reason on Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/ScienceReason

"'Religion' Of Evolution" by
• http://www.youtube.com/somtwo

A short film on the idea that evolution is a religion.

---
Please subscribe to Science & Reason:
• http://www.YouTube.com/Best0fScience
• http://www.YouTube.com/ScienceMagazine
• http://www.YouTube.com/ScienceTV
• http://www.YouTube.com/FFreeThinker
---

All clips/images used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "Fair Use" for nonprofit educational purposes (Title 17 § 107 of the USC).
.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Letter
• On
• Theory
• of
• Evolution
• Natural
• Selection
• Charles
• Darwin
• Religion
• somtwo
• Atheists
• Atheism
• Science
• Reason
• Dawkins
• Harris
• Hitchens
• Christianity
• God
• Delusion
• Christians
• Islam
• Intelligent
• Design
• ID
• Faith
• Belief
• Holy
• Bible
• Jesus
• Christ
• Catholic
• Church
• Pope
• Religious
• Fundamentalists
• Fundamentalism
• New
• Old
• Testament
• Gospels
• Young
• Earth
• Creation
• Creationists
• Creationism
• Freethinker
• Freethought

[Justwantahover]

@natureman97 We make choices and I choose to believe space has been really small and believe life brewd up in a puddle, over believing in Harry Potter type miracles like Aaron's stick turning into a snake! U have a choice of believing in space that was very, very small or a stick turning into a snake!

[Justwantahover]

@natureman97 How much energy would it take to intantly move 157,000 cubic kms of soil and rock? Billions of years is the only way to explain it (giving earth millions of years of time between strikes). But u put them in the flood and this makes survival a problem (for anything except a few microbes). I described just one impact but many are all happening in one year. Can u account for the craters without rewriting the bible? How come jelly-fish survived and hard trilobites didn't?

[Justwantahover]

@natureman97 Hey man I can prove an old earth myself (but not the big bang, other than the continuing expansion). My method is plain and simple, nothing we can't see! There are over a dozen impact craters (on or close to land) that are over 50 km diam, including several over 100 km and 5 craters nearly and over 200km diam! and the volume of soil excavated is 157,000 cubic kms! (pye r squared x average depth). 3.14 x 100 x 100 x 5 = 157,000 cubic km that is excavatd instantly!

[Justwantahover]

@Digityus Creation is worse than astrology because creationism won't accept evolution and astrrology (is a lot of bull-shit) but it still accepfs astronomy.

[lacontrabasse]

Even the Creator ' believes ' in Evolution, but not in God, as confirmed by this recent message.

The Creator has posted a video on YouTube. The message comes to you directly, without the need for transcription or interpretation by bronze-age scribes, or analysis by Stephen Hawking.

The video tells you how you came to be here, outlines the meaning and purpose of your life, and gives you an insight into the future of humankind.

See ' God says sorry. '

[HeyRuka]

Oh my god your voice <3

[ryan84160]

@tonycatman I actually think you are agreeing with everything I said, but you are just saying it different words.

It seems that you are saying you believe the books you read because everything that is said in them has ultimately been verified by experiments or has some evidence to back it up.

[tonycatman]

@ryan84160 Here is my best definition of why I believe the things written in a 'science' book over a bible.

If I can dispute anything I like in the book, and be referred back to another book, or a practical experiment, where I am free to witness things first hand and it never, ever, stops with 'because it says so in this book'. ...then I'm going to be happy to quote the book and live by what it says.

[ryan84160]

@tonycatman So things you believe are not based upon evidence ? You believe the books you read simply because you like what they have to say better than what religious people have to say? or simply because they have a fancy sounding degree ? 

[tonycatman]

@ryan84160

I could justify this as being the reason I subscribe to certain things, and it also happens to be true about the things I have read and subscribe to.

However, I would be being dishonest if I claimed this as the reason. It would just be a way of winning an argument.

In truth, I can identify a religious person before the subject ever gets mentioned. They are of a

'type', and fit a good definition of insane.