Compressed Sensing Meets Information Theory
Top Comments
All Comments (20)
-
its acutally the same as our senses or senses from higher animals are working.
-
TLDR
-
In brief what is this lecture about?
A fast logarithm for 100k 15sec things?
-
"as I mentioned"
-
Ugg, he gets Nyquist wrong too? Nyquist says you have to sample at more than twice the largest frequency component in your system; not exactly equal to. It seems pedantic, but one should get it wrong on a test, and one could get bad data in the RL.
-
It bothers me when technical people get moore's law wrong. Moore said nothing about clock rates, only about transistor/gate density on a chip.
-
I think you got a very serious analysis there from the other talk-backers - regarding your character, motives, relationships with colleagues and students e.t.c.
It's strange that you missed this professional analysis.
-
Who are the psychologists? I must be missing something...
-
Being Psychologists - it's interesting that you have the ability to understand this complicated technical stuff too.
Actually, Dror is a very serious and smart guy, and he's totally OK with his students, colleauges e.t..c.
And... I think that it could be useful to practice some modesty and not being too hasty to judge, basing on an immediate unbalanced impression.
Thanks for your GREAT comments! First, I've read Moore's original paper, and he was definitely discussing transistor counts. But many people *interpret* the "law" to refer to clock speeds, hard disk densities, and so on. Around 1999 people were even talking about internet data rates doubling every 100 days :-)
I'll need to express myself more precisely in the future, great catch!
And Nyquist is obviously *above* double the bandwidth. But are any real-world signals truly bandlimited?...
barondror 2 years ago 9
After the credit was given, I can concentrate on the main theme and say - what a great talk!
snamepi 2 years ago 5