Rolling Stones vs. Beatles

rolling stones..or the beatles?

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• rollingstonesvsbeatles

[SrPalomares]

los beatles son de otro planeta y los rolling eran buenos, pero ni ellos ni nadie superan a los beatles

[matias1962]

@dcanjura123 por favor, no digas eso. son las 2 bandas q revolucionaron simplemente: TODO. LA REVELDIA DEL HEAVY METAL (EL DIABLO 666) y esas cosas de donde salieron? black sabbath se inpiro en PAINT IT BLACK 1966, IDIOTA! solo escucha: time waits for no one (completo) cant your hear me knocking mother little helper star me up sway let it loose its only rnr y decime si siempre hacen lo mismo

[jossylove04]

BEATLESS!!!

[matias1962]

@pfootball43 tenes buen oido;)

aunque LENNON es el mejor cantante de los 3 y escucha sparks will fly ATENTAMENTE A WATTS

es un relog, y toca los platillos como chispas! no hay baterista como el

[matias1962]

@blackhorse099 te hacen llorar?

para mi, la mejor musica es la que te hace bien... bailar, rockear, en eso los mejores sin duda son la banda mas ALEGRE DE TODOS LOS TIEMPOS.

siempre hasta el dia de hoy salen con la sonrisa en la cara, ni the who ni pink floyd hoy en dia pueden seguir ROCKEANDO REALMENTE!

[tostino72]

Rolling Stones whole life!!!!!!!!!!!!

[blackhorse099]

the stones music is boring and obnoxious...i'm sorry. the beatles songs are beautiful and make me smile and cry. the end. i don't care if the stones were by definition, "cooler" or more rock...i don't give a shit.

[blackhorse099]

using the word "better" is pretty silly. i ENJOY The Beatles more, and enjoy their songs more than anything The Stones ever did. does that mean they were necessarily more skilled musicians or better writers than The Stones? not necessarily.

[pfootball43]

Best singers: 1. McCartney, 2. Jagger, 3. Lennon

Richards > Harrison

Wyman (as a bassist) > McCartney

Watts < Starr

[dcanjura123]

@xDeadMisfitsx your comment really has no facts everthing is based by you bias views and you choose the rolling stones so your opinion wouldnt matter and although i like the beatles, dont be ingnorent you know the beatles were far superior to the rolling stones, i personlay think led zeplin comes in seconed becuase if people are talking about the best bands led zeplin is usally included, your way to bias on your comments so their worthless in a way.

[dcanjura123]

@Igor64094 are you stupid?, the beatles changed music and did way more than what the rolling stones did in 40 years. and most of the rolling stones songs are the same which cant understand and the rolling stones looked up to the beatles, your such a dumbass the beatles are talked about today even though they broke up 40 yrs ago and the only reason the rolling stones are famous is becuase their still on touring and whatnot. your stupid no can simlply beat the beatles they have to prove it.