Another Darwinian Hoax

Another Darwinian hoax: Why don't Darwinists present the 'real' evidence? Because they don't have any.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• biology
• geology
• anthropology
• science
• darwin
• creation
• russ miller
• dawkins
• intelligent design
• truth
• religion

[sailcat9]

I always wonder how creationists can enjoy the benefits of science every minute of every day, from technology to medicine, and yet are still capable of throwing the switch of rational thought into the OFF position when the same sciences interfere with the primitive myths of their religious cults. Instead of raving about evolution, why aren't they declaring genetic engineering, computers, and medical imaging devices to be the work of the devil? At least be consistent.

[TheScienceFoundation]

@theinsectmanofwv Lol, implying that you have any understanding of science whatsoever.

[Entropy56]

@sailcat9 Explain how Darwinism relates to "computers", "medical imaging devices"? You are full of hyperbole. Darwinism is hyperbole. Darwinism is a religion.

[sailcat9]

@Entropy56 At least be original. Fail.

[Entropy56]

I always wonder how Darwinists can enjoy the benefits of science every minute of every day, from technology to medicine, and yet are still capable of throwing the switch of rational thought into the OFF position when the same sciences interfere with the primitive myths of their Darwinists cults. Instead of raving about creation, why aren't they declaring genetic engineering, computers, and medical imaging devices to be the work of the intelligent design? At least be consistent.

[Dimensiom]

The author of this video has evidently confused a mistaken identification by a single individual that never achieved widespread acceptance and that was quickly discarded even by the original mistaken identifier after further study with an attempt to engage in willful deception. Such confusion is understandable from individuals with no willingness to engage in actual research and with no interest in an honest presentation of data.

[thybigballs]

Phillip E. Johnson known as "The father of intelligen­t design" and co-founder of the Discovery Institute, which rejects darwinism in favor for intelligen­t design, admitted that he lies for his god in 'Reclaimin­g America For Christ'. He states,"Th­e objective is to convince people that Darwinism is inherently atheistic, thus shifting the debate from creationis­m vs. evolution to the existence of God vs. the non-existe­nce of God

[LordAvoc]

Creationism is pretty much dead. There is no more point on pushing the issue. I suggest they go down to the local BBQ Shack and have some ribs.

[legion1a]

This is creationists clutching at straws.

They are trying to mock reality; because their delusions can not be proven on any level.

The Earth is not 6,000 years old, and snakes can't talk.

Atheists didn't have to wait for Darwin to come along, there have always been Atheists since ancient times.

And theists have always thought it was correct and proper to kill them; because their Bibles and Qur'an told them to.

[ItsEasyIfYouThink]

creationism is straight impossible. I will explain if you want. But as it stands, it doesn't matter what creationists think. The evidence, simply put, is in favor of evolution. If it wasn't, we would all be young earth creationists. It's that simple. Science searches for truth, no matter what it is, based on the avaliable evidence. Too bad science isn't always on the side of religion. But just because it disagrees with you doesn't mean it has some anti-religion agenda....