9-11 fence sitters

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 9-11

[vadimcream]

I read half way into the first comment. No energy for this anymore. Can't do it... You should look into common characteristics shown by conspiracy theorists, as well as the tendencies they exhibit in building their cases. You just might see a few similarities. Have a good one.

[philosophyman76]

@vadimcream you should read what dictionary com and realize i don;t have a case I just stated why i feel warranted to not believe what was told to me. That isn't a conspiracy theory

[dugall1]

Very good point with the airplane over Washington and that no videos were recorded. Not a single little video, not any second with an airplane on it! Very strange and suspicious. I completely agree with you, to be critic with the official version of the happenings.

[philosophyman76]

what air traffic controller would you need if the flight never took off? what air traffic controllers are there in mexico? where were the air traffic controllers when the flight was heading the wrong directon to hit the pentagon? since you think planes are constantly watched and picked up on radar. why don't they show the radar reports of them tracking the plane hitting the pentagon. THERE YOU GO. that would be proof I would like. where are those reports. what site and we can be done with this

[philosophyman76]

it doesnt say "Heres what I think happened at the pentagon." I don't create a theory. I asked questions. Thats how you get answers. If you would have said here is a site with video of a plane, or here's why there is no footage and emp went off and all electrical stuf went off... or anything valid then I would say ok i get it. But you haven't. You just asked me a lot of crap that i don't have answers for. I DON"T HAVE ANSWERS BC I DON"T KNOW WHAT TO BELIEVE AKA FENCE-SITTER

[philosophyman76]

@vadimcream One more time for the incredibly slow. You can call me what ever you want. you want to label me because I don't agree with you. thats fine. You have asked me hundreds of questions not relating to what my video is . My response is I don't know or here's what could have happened. These are not my theories or what I believe. Here I don't believe and earthquake knocked over the pentagon. why no evidence. My vid for the last time says i don't believe the govt story and here's why.

[philosophyman76]

@vadimnow your going to tell me what I am CONVINCED of? Wow thats amazing. you can read minds through a computer screen. No wonder you are so sure of the story you watched bush on tv read his mind and realized he was telling the truth. well damn it that's enough evidence for me. I am no longer on the fence.

my definition of CT is what the meaning is. Look up the word conspiracy then look up the word theory and put them together. you can go to dictionary . com. oh wait is that a CT website too

[philosophyman76]

@vadimcream why do you keep saying it has to be Shot Down. Maybe with your limited view you can't think of a way to do it but I bet there may be people on earth who are smarter then you and me who could figure it out. Hell i bet if I was posting about how arabs with box cutters are going to hijack planes and fly them into the pentagon bbefore 9-11 happened you'd sit there and type how IMPOSSIBLE that would be and point out all the ways it wouldn't work,

[vadimcream]

@pman76

You ARE convinced that there was foul play. Just the fact that you do not believe the official story alone proves that you are not a fence-sitter. You believe lies were told and unknown wrong-doings were comitted. So you are NOT a fence-sitter. Get it?

And your definition of CT is broad, trite and severely under-defined.

The reason why this IS A CONSPIRACY theory is because this truly is an event that could not have been accomplished with out the participation of thousands.

[vadimcream]

@philosophyman76 Why do you insist that you are not a fence-sitter? It sounds like you just don't want to call it out because you are afraid to embrace all of the judgments that might come with labeling yourself this.

You are not the least bit neutral (i.e. a "fence-sittler") on the matter of whether or not there was foul play involved. This is the distinction here that clearly shows that you are NOT A FENCE-SITTER in the least.