The apparent definition of "telekinesis" is "the power to move something by thinking about it without the application of physical force". I personally won't dispute ‘brain’ communications with some sort of aid in perhaps 100s or 1000s of years from now (if we can survive that long) by way of some sort of artificial amplification of known ie existing electrical activity in the brain, but I don't believe in telekinesis at all as described. That has to be ridiculous.
@mphello Where have I disagreed with Randi? I haven't disagreed with him at all. If anything I have stated loud and clear that he is rather correct in his statements. Perhaps this conversation was over before it started as well?
@RS1963 Frankly, I don't see how you could agree OR disagree with me on anything: going over your comments, I see you make strong statements against claims of telekinesis and then other posts strongly against James Randi.
@mphello and the long hard work of scientists, mathematicians, and engineers to create new tools and probes, will be able to harness the supernatural powers of today in any practical meaningful way. By "supernatural powers" I mean those phenomena (like interstellar or interdimensional travel by aliens, ghosts, telekinesis) which we glimpse at only extremely rarely under totally uncontrolled unexpected times and for which we do not yet have adequate scientific explanation.
the lady alson did the same thing with glass over it he should expose how she did that too
PlaystationTillRIP 8 hours ago
The apparent definition of "telekinesis" is "the power to move something by thinking about it without the application of physical force". I personally won't dispute ‘brain’ communications with some sort of aid in perhaps 100s or 1000s of years from now (if we can survive that long) by way of some sort of artificial amplification of known ie existing electrical activity in the brain, but I don't believe in telekinesis at all as described. That has to be ridiculous.
trident3b 23 hours ago
Dangit, It's a shame that he's not very manly because i always thought he kicked ass.
ZaZ1230 3 days ago
@mphello Where have I disagreed with Randi? I haven't disagreed with him at all. If anything I have stated loud and clear that he is rather correct in his statements. Perhaps this conversation was over before it started as well?
RS1963 4 days ago
@RS1963 Frankly, I don't see how you could agree OR disagree with me on anything: going over your comments, I see you make strong statements against claims of telekinesis and then other posts strongly against James Randi.
mphello 4 days ago
@IceAges14Aces Very true and sadly a good many that post on this topic and others like this one, don't understand that fact.
RS1963 5 days ago
@johnydubz The cover has been explained many many times over read more of this thread.
RS1963 5 days ago
@mphello and the long hard work of scientists, mathematicians, and engineers to create new tools and probes, will be able to harness the supernatural powers of today in any practical meaningful way. By "supernatural powers" I mean those phenomena (like interstellar or interdimensional travel by aliens, ghosts, telekinesis) which we glimpse at only extremely rarely under totally uncontrolled unexpected times and for which we do not yet have adequate scientific explanation.
mphello 5 days ago